Again, go ahead and cherry pick pieces of the conversation all you want and continue to dox me. Voiding a contract and walking away with someone's money is abhorrent... in fact, it's also illegal. You've already admitted to doing this so you really have no defense. Send my money back and we can both move on, it's as straightforward as that. You don't get to modify contractual terms to fit your agenda (which is to walk off with people's money). The money doesn't belong to you or your partner. It's my money. You're a scammer, through and through. AND, not only that, you also don't even have the decency to discuss this privately, instead you want to grandstand to your followers and slander me (not to mention the doxxing...). You blocked and ignored every attempt I've made to engage in this conversation privately. You're not entitled to someone's money just because you decide they're rude or whatever. Sorry about the language, truly - remember I already apologized several times. Legitimately, I wish nothing bad for you or your family. I was in the throes of a personal crisis at the time and I meant no offense. I really can't understand how you can preach all the bullshit you preach and then do something like walk away with someone's money. Which is it, are you enlightened or are you a thief? You can't be both.
I made no claims to be either. It's not possible to share the entire email conversation with a few screen grabs.
What is this "contract" you feel has been voided and where is your evidence? You quite clearly are not willing to communicate "decently", openly or factually.
My partner fulfilled her agreed skype meeting with you and responsibly refused to book anything more with you. No matter how much you tried to buy her attention.
So what then is your purpose of continuing? To further incriminate yourself and make false accusations against someone you don't know.
I will continue to communicate with you through this page only, where all is saved on the blockchain for future reference. Please do yourself a favor and don't spam other users, they may start flagging you.
"I will continue to communicate with you through this page only, where all is saved on the blockchain for future reference. Please do yourself a favor and don't spam other users, they may start flagging you."
One more thing, Keni. If I screenshot and post all the evidence I have (again emails that we both already have [same email thread that you sampled from already above] and transaction history from Bitcoin addresses that I own), what will your response be? Are you saying that if I post up the evidence you'll send the money back? Can I get a commitment on that?
No doubt about it, we are not friends and still not enemies. No money will be sent and none of this is necessary. No screenshot will change any of these fact. All your evidence is the same as mine, you're free to commit to whatever you wish.
We invite you to quit your smear campaign and move on with a positive life.
Then why did you ask for evidence? You knew that we both had the same set of emails and yet you asked this question as if I don't have proof of what happened and as if we don't have the same copies of the emails..? Why did you ask this question if the evidence clearly shows that you and Jamie walked away with my money?
You are right. The emails clearly do NOT show any evidence of any of your false personal accusations or allegations against me. All of which you are directly libel for defamation and slander in any court.
All agreements were honored and no further appointments made.
Absolutely simple point, only you the owner have the right to give up your own property.
Yes you shared your public newspaper article about your endeavors. Yes it is on the first page google of your name. Yes your name is on public record. Yes you have had the same IP address associated with your social media accounts and this slanderous account @kenistylesconman.
Yes you have been excessively rude, threatening and abusive since the start of our correspondence. There can really be no call for moral or ethical standing given the grotesque evidence offered against you. See posted email samples, courts will look at the course of conduct between the parties to determine if a contract exists. Continuing to behave this way online further constitutes harassment:
We see that you are intentionally targeting me, slandering me to my readers and well, annoying is relative and subjective. What my evidence does show is that we are clearly not on the same page about acceptable written conversation or what the difference is between agreement and contractual obligation. Furthermore your approach to resolving this issue while unique, is completely up to you. I won't bother getting into all your other random conjectures.
Your own BTC transaction report laid alongside your email time/date stamps clearly show your initial offering and our video archives match the meeting. Your further gifts coincide with her refusal to continue communicating disrespectfully. None of which was ever invited, role-played, pre-arranged or agreed. We thank you for your past-due apology and have already accepted your gifts as consolidated compensation.
The only one you have the right to judge is yourself.
Again, go ahead and cherry pick pieces of the conversation all you want and continue to dox me. Voiding a contract and walking away with someone's money is abhorrent... in fact, it's also illegal. You've already admitted to doing this so you really have no defense. Send my money back and we can both move on, it's as straightforward as that. You don't get to modify contractual terms to fit your agenda (which is to walk off with people's money). The money doesn't belong to you or your partner. It's my money. You're a scammer, through and through. AND, not only that, you also don't even have the decency to discuss this privately, instead you want to grandstand to your followers and slander me (not to mention the doxxing...). You blocked and ignored every attempt I've made to engage in this conversation privately. You're not entitled to someone's money just because you decide they're rude or whatever. Sorry about the language, truly - remember I already apologized several times. Legitimately, I wish nothing bad for you or your family. I was in the throes of a personal crisis at the time and I meant no offense. I really can't understand how you can preach all the bullshit you preach and then do something like walk away with someone's money. Which is it, are you enlightened or are you a thief? You can't be both.
I made no claims to be either. It's not possible to share the entire email conversation with a few screen grabs.
What is this "contract" you feel has been voided and where is your evidence? You quite clearly are not willing to communicate "decently", openly or factually.
My partner fulfilled her agreed skype meeting with you and responsibly refused to book anything more with you. No matter how much you tried to buy her attention.
So what then is your purpose of continuing? To further incriminate yourself and make false accusations against someone you don't know.
I will continue to communicate with you through this page only, where all is saved on the blockchain for future reference. Please do yourself a favor and don't spam other users, they may start flagging you.
Let's keep to facts.
?
"I will continue to communicate with you through this page only, where all is saved on the blockchain for future reference. Please do yourself a favor and don't spam other users, they may start flagging you."
Where's the communication??
Where is your evidence Julian @kenistylesconman?
One more thing, Keni. If I screenshot and post all the evidence I have (again emails that we both already have [same email thread that you sampled from already above] and transaction history from Bitcoin addresses that I own), what will your response be? Are you saying that if I post up the evidence you'll send the money back? Can I get a commitment on that?
I can assure you this : We owe you nothing.
No doubt about it, we are not friends and still not enemies. No money will be sent and none of this is necessary. No screenshot will change any of these fact. All your evidence is the same as mine, you're free to commit to whatever you wish.
We invite you to quit your smear campaign and move on with a positive life.
Then why did you ask for evidence? You knew that we both had the same set of emails and yet you asked this question as if I don't have proof of what happened and as if we don't have the same copies of the emails..? Why did you ask this question if the evidence clearly shows that you and Jamie walked away with my money?
You are right. The emails clearly do NOT show any evidence of any of your false personal accusations or allegations against me. All of which you are directly libel for defamation and slander in any court.
All agreements were honored and no further appointments made.
Absolutely simple point, only you the owner have the right to give up your own property.
Yes you shared your public newspaper article about your endeavors. Yes it is on the first page google of your name. Yes your name is on public record. Yes you have had the same IP address associated with your social media accounts and this slanderous account @kenistylesconman.
Yes you have been excessively rude, threatening and abusive since the start of our correspondence. There can really be no call for moral or ethical standing given the grotesque evidence offered against you. See posted email samples, courts will look at the course of conduct between the parties to determine if a contract exists. Continuing to behave this way online further constitutes harassment:
Generally, criminal harassment entails intentionally targeting someone else with behavior that is meant to alarm, annoy, torment or terrorize them. Not all petty annoyances constitute harassment. Instead, most state laws require that the behavior cause a credible threat to the person's safety or their family's safety. - FindLaw.com / Thomson Reuters
We see that you are intentionally targeting me, slandering me to my readers and well, annoying is relative and subjective. What my evidence does show is that we are clearly not on the same page about acceptable written conversation or what the difference is between agreement and contractual obligation. Furthermore your approach to resolving this issue while unique, is completely up to you. I won't bother getting into all your other random conjectures.
Your own BTC transaction report laid alongside your email time/date stamps clearly show your initial offering and our video archives match the meeting. Your further gifts coincide with her refusal to continue communicating disrespectfully. None of which was ever invited, role-played, pre-arranged or agreed. We thank you for your past-due apology and have already accepted your gifts as consolidated compensation.
The only one you have the right to judge is yourself.
There is nothing further from us.