You can only say this because you haven't seen women in power.
Most women, when the get power are tyrants.
They lack the physical presence, so they make it up with emotionally manipulative practices.
Currently women shout, "my body, my choice". Well, when women get in power, it is your body, their choice. They will decide who is suitable and capable to breed.
With women in charge, wars become covert things. Not covert like the CIA, but something in the background of every deal. Something that you can't fight about and get it over. An every present hostility.
Men have natural leadership tendencies. It comes with the testosterone. So, you will get like 10% of men who are good at leading. Women leaders are less that 1%. Further, in polls, women prefer working for men, than women.
#banmen is a tiny group (The Powers that shouldn't Be) trying to get women to destroy themselves and society.
It has no practical benefit. It won't fix anything. It is just getting women to blame all of their problems on an external focus. And since women have an in-group gender preference, it is really easy to get them to hate #allmen.
Women are also seeking to perfect their sexual strategy. It used to be that women had to settle for a beta guy, because it was one husband / one wife. Now, with welfare and women working, they do not need the beta guy, what they want is the alpha.
So, women are clearly stating, they want all the beta men to just go disappear, and leave them to fucking the alpha men. Or basically, they are looking to form harems.
And men still do all the dirty jobs, all the mechanical jobs, all the necessary infrastructure jobs. Women focus on the few guys at the top, and ignore (as in don't even see) the men at the bottom.
Of course I've seen women in power. Some have been bad, some have been terrific. But the thing is, women who get power today get it in a patriarchal system, and some of them adopt the ways of the system to get ahead.
That's how you get the Margaret Thatchers of the world. Women who, in order to get ahead in a man's world, feel they must be twice as vicious.
As for the alpha and beta crap, you just gave me an idea for next week's post. Thanks, I guess.
Aww @builderofcastles <3 anyone will do the garbags if it needs to be done and money is to be made -- unless it can be automated ;)
As for mechanical jobs a lot of women like and want those positions.
Many women see you. Dont believe that hype, please. This concept of sloha and beta? We are beyond that. Stop finding womrn in bars. Stop basing your dating profile off of maxim magazine. Start finding wimen who share your interests and will love you accept you , uplift you, and also be a badass feminist bawse. We exist.
My comment is not about anything that I feel. Its not about any past relationship or relationshit.
I am telling you that there is a group of men who are already gone away.
They are beneath notice. They are invisible to women. (studies have shown) And a woman's entire world is based on these men continuing to do what they do.
This group is already banned.
Their needs are laughed at.
Their suicide rate is at epidemic levels. And if I bring up this statistic, I am just called old and bitter.
So, you do what women often do, make the talk personal.
What I am doing is trying to pass along information. Facts.
This planet has gone through many cycles. In some cycles women are the leaders, then it swaps. I am tired of it flopping back and forth. I hope this next cycle we will find something better.
And it will probably start with understanding what men are good at and what women are good at. (The feminists never talk about what women are really strong at. I guess if they showed women as being much stronger than men in X, Y & Z, then they couldn't play the victim card)
"the feminists" ?? Lol. Ok. Im done. 🦑🤷♀️❤️🙅🏼
Why does that trigger you?
I have never heard them once talk about any of women's strengths.
A hint: it is the reason women aren't allowed to be priests.
I keep hoping Jezebel will run a story on it, but they have never, ever touched it.
And in order to reach "the feminists" you had to read past epidemic rates of male suicide. I guess men aren't important.
Why on earth would any sane man want a feminist as a wife?? It would be 24/7 of her trying to assert herself as the man of the house. A man wants a woman, not a woman who wants to be a man.
Its probably worthless to respond, however, I don't want to be a man. I am a woman who wants respect for my individuality as human who doesn't fit into a simple gender stereotype. I want the same for men who have that same struggle. I want men to not be shamed for exploring the very natural human instinct to connect and be vulnerable. I want women to not be shamed for having over sexual desires. I don't want to be a man. In fact its very saddening to me when people say that I want to be a man or that I am manly. IMO maleness and feminity are not so finite and both can be strong and hard and soft... etc... Some of the strongest men I have ever met have loved letting me lead.
But maybe that doesn't work for you.
I fully hope that you going your own way is a fruitful journey that leads to great internal joy and contentment.
I don't think it sounds too fun but I had to be alone myself sometimes to figure out what I really wanted and needed.
we all on this spinning rock just wanting to be alive and free and loved and respected.
I gave you an upvote for not replying as a typical feminist with insults and hysteria.
I wish I could say the same. Maybe someday.
When I’m assertive in the workplace, I’m a “tyrant” or a flat out bitch. And yes i have a high level leadership role in a large organization. When my male peers exhibit similar behaviors they are “results-driven” and “ambitious”. Truly the exact same behaviors just perceived entirely differently. I have witness, and been victim of many an “emotional manipulation” played at the hand of a male leader.
What I find when investigating such as you have said is that there are many differences.
Such as the men using overt communication and the women using covert communication.
The men using open agreements and women using assumed agreements.
Leading is not an easy task. Every leader would wish for better followers, but that is pushing responsibility to what is outside of one's control. So, a great leader will learn what is effective in leading their group.
I would challenge the fact that men in the workplace use overt communication. They do, with each other, yet often times I have found leave their female peers out of these conversations. Over with each other, covert overall.
Leading is difficult and that's why its a small subset of the population (both male and female) that do it well. However, if a leader is "wishing" for better followers, then they are in fact not leading at all.