RE: dTube: Will We Ever Have One World Government? Should We?
We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.
Decentralization of all power structures and defunding the centralized banking systems that fund these tyrannical wars and power grabs, is the whole point of cryptocurrency isn't it?
Isn't the history of the abuse of humanity by people running the centralized money systems exactly why we're here today on Steemit in the cryptocurrency economy?
"Utopia" for the power hungry abusive elite, is hell for everyone else. Saying one global government is to "end wars" is a complete lie, since you'd have to make endless jackboot wars just to try to keep the rest of the world dominated and submitted to you.
And that's why we can't have, and refuse to have, a one world government.
You're probably going to think I'm crazy, but if you're crazy too, read on:
'We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.'
I don't believe that's true. I think once the scarcity mindset is scoured from the human race, and I think it will be, the noble 'upper class' will become the actual superior class that they were believed to be. Instead of being a class that exists to exploit the poor, they'll be a class that exists to save the poor. Instead of competing for wealth and power, they'll compete for prestige, and honour. Wealth will be perceived as what one gives, not what one has.
But again: I know that sounds crazy.
I think ideally wealth should be a burden, not a priviledge. And call me crazy: I believe that class division is healthy, and natural. I don't think everyone wants to be rich. Actually I think very few people do. Don't believe me? Look at every rich person and tell me they look like they're happy. Most happy people are in the middle class or formerly working class.
'The difference between a little money and no money at all is enormous — and can shatter the world. And the difference between a little money and an enormous amount of money is very slight — and that, also, can shatter the world.'