We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.
Decentralization of all power structures and defunding the centralized banking systems that fund these tyrannical wars and power grabs, is the whole point of cryptocurrency isn't it?
Isn't the history of the abuse of humanity by people running the centralized money systems exactly why we're here today on Steemit in the cryptocurrency economy?
"Utopia" for the power hungry abusive elite, is hell for everyone else. Saying one global government is to "end wars" is a complete lie, since you'd have to make endless jackboot wars just to try to keep the rest of the world dominated and submitted to you.
And that's why we can't have, and refuse to have, a one world government.
You're probably going to think I'm crazy, but if you're crazy too, read on:
'We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.'
I don't believe that's true. I think once the scarcity mindset is scoured from the human race, and I think it will be, the noble 'upper class' will become the actual superior class that they were believed to be. Instead of being a class that exists to exploit the poor, they'll be a class that exists to save the poor. Instead of competing for wealth and power, they'll compete for prestige, and honour. Wealth will be perceived as what one gives, not what one has.
But again: I know that sounds crazy.
I think ideally wealth should be a burden, not a priviledge. And call me crazy: I believe that class division is healthy, and natural. I don't think everyone wants to be rich. Actually I think very few people do. Don't believe me? Look at every rich person and tell me they look like they're happy. Most happy people are in the middle class or formerly working class.
'The difference between a little money and no money at all is enormous — and can shatter the world. And the difference between a little money and an enormous amount of money is very slight — and that, also, can shatter the world.'
Hello David. Really enjoy your show! Would you be interested in interviewing someone from Goldmoney? If so I could try and help set something up for you. Please let me know!
Thank you for your interest! Goldmoney is a publicly traded company with $2 billion in client assets ... Its an easy way to purchase incremental or large amounts of gold ( or other precious metals) on your phone. The gold is stored in a vaults of your choice around the world. We are third party audited and insured. The gold is spendable and physically redeemable. It’s like an online bank account except your balance is dominated in gold grams instead of your local currency. You can also buy and store cryptocurrency offline in cold storage! Goldmoney is not a cryptocurrency, but real audited gold that you own. Please let me know if you have any more questions :)
Hi David. I follow you on Youtube and on here and DLive. Thank you for talking about the PANTOS ICO and Steemit. I deeply appreciate independent media and progressives like you. There is a lot of trash and misinformation on the television and online today, and it is refreshing to have reliable sources of information.
If a world government became a tyranny that allowed no voice, there would be no exit, either. A nightmarish scenario. A government can also fuck things up for an individual. Where is that individual to go if the same government is everywhere?
I think if that was to happen it would be global catastrophe , it would be worst than it is now , tyranny would rule the world on a much bigger scale , it is bad we have to listen to people in government who think there know what is best for us. So no thanks
I think that we won't. But there will be a one world government. It could be because of a 1984 scenario, but I think by the time we get to the OWG, it won't be us, our human race. The species will have evolved too far to call it 'humanity'.
I've heard it said that by the next couple decades man will have changed into another species. There are significant physical* changes that mark this, but also ideological and intellectual ones as well. I should remind anyone reading this that the difference between two species isn't the ability to breed, but the unwillingness to breed. Outside of fetishists you wouldn't fuck a caveman/woman, would you? Same for a new man human looking back at 1920's humans.
*Physical changes including vastly increased cranial capacity. Since the caesarian section was invented cranium sizes, and IQ have been ballooning. The main limiter on child birth in men is the need for us to exit the womb, the head being the limiting factor. That's why so many women die in childbirth and why are kids are so fucking stupid compared to other animals. Our physical size is also increasing massively, no pun intended, 100 years ago only nobles were average height today, Goliath was like scarcely 6'.... The most important parts of humanity are science and technology, both of which are about to explode in puissance and intimacy with our race. Insert Space Odessy clip here.
We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.
Decentralization of all power structures and defunding the centralized banking systems that fund these tyrannical wars and power grabs, is the whole point of cryptocurrency isn't it?
Isn't the history of the abuse of humanity by people running the centralized money systems exactly why we're here today on Steemit in the cryptocurrency economy?
"Utopia" for the power hungry abusive elite, is hell for everyone else. Saying one global government is to "end wars" is a complete lie, since you'd have to make endless jackboot wars just to try to keep the rest of the world dominated and submitted to you.
And that's why we can't have, and refuse to have, a one world government.
You're probably going to think I'm crazy, but if you're crazy too, read on:
'We will never have a one world government, because concentrating power to one central point always leads to abuse of power, meaning tyranny, and the people of the world are just not going to submit to that, much less permanetly.
In answer to your caller, "how do we get to a war-free world?" - The answer is to continually decentralize everything that is possible to decentralize, to simply disable all the predatory pathways of the arrogant self-appointed "elites", who have been instigating every war in history for millennia, for their own filthy blood money profit.'
I don't believe that's true. I think once the scarcity mindset is scoured from the human race, and I think it will be, the noble 'upper class' will become the actual superior class that they were believed to be. Instead of being a class that exists to exploit the poor, they'll be a class that exists to save the poor. Instead of competing for wealth and power, they'll compete for prestige, and honour. Wealth will be perceived as what one gives, not what one has.
But again: I know that sounds crazy.
I think ideally wealth should be a burden, not a priviledge. And call me crazy: I believe that class division is healthy, and natural. I don't think everyone wants to be rich. Actually I think very few people do. Don't believe me? Look at every rich person and tell me they look like they're happy. Most happy people are in the middle class or formerly working class.
'The difference between a little money and no money at all is enormous — and can shatter the world. And the difference between a little money and an enormous amount of money is very slight — and that, also, can shatter the world.'
Hello David. Really enjoy your show! Would you be interested in interviewing someone from Goldmoney? If so I could try and help set something up for you. Please let me know!
I am not familiar with Goldmoney. What it is?
Thank you for your interest! Goldmoney is a publicly traded company with $2 billion in client assets ... Its an easy way to purchase incremental or large amounts of gold ( or other precious metals) on your phone. The gold is stored in a vaults of your choice around the world. We are third party audited and insured. The gold is spendable and physically redeemable. It’s like an online bank account except your balance is dominated in gold grams instead of your local currency. You can also buy and store cryptocurrency offline in cold storage! Goldmoney is not a cryptocurrency, but real audited gold that you own. Please let me know if you have any more questions :)
Hi David. I follow you on Youtube and on here and DLive. Thank you for talking about the PANTOS ICO and Steemit. I deeply appreciate independent media and progressives like you. There is a lot of trash and misinformation on the television and online today, and it is refreshing to have reliable sources of information.
Short answers: hell no!
If a world government became a tyranny that allowed no voice, there would be no exit, either. A nightmarish scenario. A government can also fuck things up for an individual. Where is that individual to go if the same government is everywhere?
I think if that was to happen it would be global catastrophe , it would be worst than it is now , tyranny would rule the world on a much bigger scale , it is bad we have to listen to people in government who think there know what is best for us. So no thanks
I think that we won't. But there will be a one world government. It could be because of a 1984 scenario, but I think by the time we get to the OWG, it won't be us, our human race. The species will have evolved too far to call it 'humanity'.
I've heard it said that by the next couple decades man will have changed into another species. There are significant physical* changes that mark this, but also ideological and intellectual ones as well. I should remind anyone reading this that the difference between two species isn't the ability to breed, but the unwillingness to breed. Outside of fetishists you wouldn't fuck a caveman/woman, would you? Same for a new man human looking back at 1920's humans.
*Physical changes including vastly increased cranial capacity. Since the caesarian section was invented cranium sizes, and IQ have been ballooning. The main limiter on child birth in men is the need for us to exit the womb, the head being the limiting factor. That's why so many women die in childbirth and why are kids are so fucking stupid compared to other animals. Our physical size is also increasing massively, no pun intended, 100 years ago only nobles were average height today, Goliath was like scarcely 6'.... The most important parts of humanity are science and technology, both of which are about to explode in puissance and intimacy with our race. Insert Space Odessy clip here.