Practical Bob and his Practical Jar of AnswerssteemCreated with Sketch.

in #libertarianism8 years ago (edited)

Are you familiar with computer and video games?

I suppose that’s a vague question since there are a myriad of types of video games. I should be more specific.

Are you familiar with simulation games, specifically world simulation or “god games” where you play the role of the world or civilization builder? Often times these games start with a relatively blank canvas and you can choose how customized you want your world to be from a set of predetermined settings. So for example, you may want a world with lots of waterways where you can build cities and towns that have an economy based on fishing and sea faring. Or you may prefer a forested world or a desert landscape. Or perhaps you want a combination where you can build competing civilizations dependent on different resources. Many soothing hours can be spent building civilizations, developing their characteristics, and watching their advantages work themselves out.

Most games have features that programmers call “wizards” where you can overcome basic problems of a developing civilization by utilizing preset solutions that the wizard can do for you with some simple commands. For example, lets say you’re developing a civilization that you want to watch move from the Neolithic Age to the Bronze Age. To do this your civilization will need an abundance of stone, copper ore, tin ore, and enough food to provide leisure time for your people to utilize their skills on something other than finding sustenance. A wizard program can do this for you with preset functions. You simply launch the wizard and it solves the resource problem. No need to go all over your virtual world placing ore deposits and berry bushes in random locations hoping your little people can find them.

A different example of a wizard was the annoying Microsoft Office Assistant “Clippy” a feature developed for the single purpose of driving people crazy. In the case of Clippy, he could be set to appear only when you request him or he could jump onto your screen randomly and attempt to humiliate and annoy you. Clippy was originally a part of a wizard program called Microsoft Bob. Yes, Bob was discontinued because he was a dismal failure and Clippy eventually joined him in cyber Purgatory where they will burn in agony until they have paid for their annoying tendencies, but the concept is still good and has shown to be useful in a variety of applications.

I was thinking the other day, and I came to the conclusion that a wizard would be handy to have when explaining anarcho-capitalism to those who are not fully comfortable with completely eliminating the State. Let’s say you have a small program called Practical Bob. Whenever you’re talking about liberty and you mention that the State is the source of a particular problem and the other person says, “Yes, but without the State we would have no roads and highways!” Practical Bob would pop in and say, “It looks like you need a solution to the road problem, can I help?” Then Practical Bob reaches into his Practical Jar of answers and hands the solution to the person. You could even make Bob look like Walter Block.

You see, when a person begins to contemplate the foundational moral axiom of libertarianism, the Zero Aggression Principle, and as they come to grips with the depth of the meaning of property right, that person will either rejecting the core of libertarianism, choose to ignore the elephant in the room, or admit there is no moral justification for a State. Once they understand that the State is an entirely immoral concept they are faced with the dilemma of keeping some part of the State for practical purposes or placing their hopes in some vague faith that everything will be just fine without the State. This can be a terrifying proposition.

On the other hand, for the fully immersed anarcho-capitalist who is trying to help the new libertarian see that a truly free market can supply all of humanity’s needs, having to back up and deal with a simple issue like roads, water rights, policing, foreign threats, etc, can be frustrating. Who of us hasn’t been that stereotypical libertarian, listing book after book insisting that if the other person would simply read those 20 volumes and spend a few hundred hours studying Austrian Economics they would understand the power of the market?

So then, I propose that some industrious libertarian with computer skills create a phone app. By simple prompt, Practical Bob would launch and ask what kind of help you would like. Then Bob would reach into his Practical Jar and pull out a sound bite by any of several popular authors.

Example:

User ~ “Practical Bob”
Bob ~ “What can I help you with?”
User ~ “private security and police”
Bob ~ “I’m sorry, please clarify. Rothbard or Molyneux?”
User ~ “Molyneux”
Bob ~ reaches into his jar and pulls out the cover image for Practical Anarchy by Stefan Molyneux, a section on DRO’s begins to play and you hear Stefan’s voice. Additionally, a link to where you can buy the book appears.

Or:

User ~ “Practical Bob”
Bob ~ “What can I help you with?”
User ~ “IP Law”
Bob ~ whips out Against Intellectual Property by Stephan Kinsella and you hear Jock Coats‘ voice.

Or:

User ~ “Practical Bob”
Bob ~ “What can I help you with?”
User ~ “slavery”
Bob ~ “I’m sorry, please clarify. ‘Slavery in a libertarian society’ or ‘Lincoln and slavery'”
User ~ “Slavery in a libertarian society”
Bob ~ out comes For a New Liberty by Rothbard and you hear the voice of Floy Lilley reading “Chapter 5, Involuntary Servitude”

With a wildly popular app like this, the next logical step would be to actually create a “god game” with Practical Bob and his Practical Jar helping you build a perfect anarcho-capitalist world. Or perhaps Practical Bob as a dropdown feature in a MMORPG that would incorporate anarcho-capitalism in a rich online environment.

I can’t guarantee I would play such a game, but I could convince myself to cash the check if someone wants to write such games and slip me some of the profits.

Ben Stone
2011

logo
For more articles and podcasts about liberty, the non-aggression principle, and property rights, visit badquaker.com. Click here for the permalink to the original article.

Sort:  

Okay, I'm pretty sure this wasn't what you were aiming for with this, but right now I really feel the need to play the Sims...

If the article inspires you toward that end, perhaps some good has been done regardless.

Nice! Lincoln "freed" the blacks and enslaved a nation. I've kind of stopped following Molyneux, his ego got a little overbearing. He also changes his point of view to suit Whatever narrative he happens to be espousing at the time. Upvoted & resteemed!

Remember, this article is from 2011, before Molyneux went completely off the deep end.

I missed that...it comes from being really old! I'm glad to see I'm not the only one that sees it. I used to really enjoy his videos (the one he did on Lincoln was excellent) but I started noticing that he was contradicting himself. Alex Jones is another one...I tried to watch an interview he did with someone and he kept interrupting the guy to interject his opinion...besides being totally full of shit, he's become annoying as well!

what happens to AnCap when a gang groups together and violates the no aggression principle?
What if that gang calls itself government?
What if each time AnCap is tried, that gang forms because it realizes it can?
A person might be tempted to conclude that AnCap won't work in the future because it hasn't worked in the past.
Your faith in mankind seems unhampered by considering negative attributes.

I back your intention to improve things. We share that. AnCap shouldn't be a religion - it is like a theory and should be treated as such.

Lol, that video is a perfect elaboration of my assertions. Nice to see others with a clear view of the situation.

Did you really watch it through to the end?

Yeah, did you think it contradicted what I said?

If you can't trust people to be free, how can you trust people to govern? Every aspect of humanity that you fear is rewarded by the psychological and financial incentives of political power, whereas the market process rewards cooperatoin for mutual benefit.

You can't trust people to be free - at least not in all ways, or all of them, or perhaps even all the time. I am not aware of any comprehensive study of the nature of corruption. Therefore, I'm working on the intrinsic nature of corruption myself.

In the market process, corruption is renamed collusion. It is the Achilles heel of capitalism and it arises in corporations at the same rate that corruption arises in governments. Some other forms it takes are planned obsolescence, artificial scarcity, and even artificial desire by rebinding instincts of people to create markets. That is all to say it is a systemic property and it appears with absolute certainty given enough time.

The AnCap style solution of disbanding higher organization to eliminate corruption at higher levels does impact the problem. It does eliminate corruption from those levels. It doesn't eliminate corruption altogether but it does pragmatically eliminate Pyramids, space travel, high rises, terraforming, etc. It eliminates any endeavor which implicitly requires the organization of people to act cohesively to accomplish. It is whack-a-mole. The problem re-expresses itself in a different form and place. There is value in whack-a-mole solutions - they are like experiments that give you another instance observation and more information about the rules that define the phenomena.

Corruption exists at the individual level as well, in fact it winds into the individual. The dopamine reward system which has evolved to shape behavior and ensure the survival of species is hijacked by addictions and other behavioral viruses. Viruses are a concise instance of the 'corruption' phenomena. Cryptography is another concise framing with its trust system/code breaker adversarial model. Godel's incompleteness theorem ensures that the competition will be a perpetual part of systems. Informatics supplies the proof of universal computability that enables it to spread to unrelated systems.

I find that corruption is a fundamental feature of information. I think that looking at its anthropic forms can yield useful insights, but the real key to understanding it will come from observing it in its most irreducible forms in physics, thermodynamics, informatics, game theory, etc.

At this point, most will sort of throw their hands up and conclude you should just accept it and focus on something actually solvable. Except, there are some existential implications for mankind that will arrive in the near term future. Without a deep understanding of this to develop defenses, global nuclear war is going to seem like a quaint alternative.

If corruption is such a problem, psychology, economics, and history all agree that a government is the worst solution possible. Power corrupts and lures the corrupt.

Only in creedom do we jave the opportunity to improve. Every advancement in society has been the result of the exercise of freedpm, and collusion is only sustainable when proyecyed by government. Austrian economocs provides a more thoroigh explanation than i can offer here. I suggest Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt as a starting point.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 69345.70
ETH 3342.84
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74