You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemworld.org bonus feature for redfish
If I understand that, what I want to say is that it is not more profitable a powerful vote to a good post to win curatorship than many small votes in many posts? At the end of the day, does not a big vote give more profit than many small ones or am I wrong?
if I'm not mistaken, the curatorship gives more $ the more percentage of vote or vote strength (sp) demos then why my doubts, at the end of accounts it seems that the same effect is to distribute small votes of little power of sp or distribute less votes but 100%
I do not know if I understand what I mean because I'm using a translator.
@networker5, it all depends on the post you voted, sometimes a small vote can earn you more curation if
But most times I do not care about curation reward when I upvote. I just feel good upvoting that quality content with zero or low upvote. I understood what you mean. Thanks a lot.
If I understand your point, there are often contents that we want to vote not only for the reward but because they deserve that vote no matter how small a large sum of small votes will give a good reward to the author who deserved it.
although in my case I have to take good care of that point since I am still a small fish and I have to play a lot with the parameters to maximize the profit if I want to grow on the platform.
I need to feed the little fish before I die of hunger ;)
@networker5, whichever method you choose is all great. That is just my method I described. Thanks a lot.
thanks to you we keep in touch.