I am now watching his post - it is very short, because of this, apparently 75% of uniqueness.
It is obvious that the author took a paragraph of text and redid it a little. But not enough to make the check fail. Due to the small total volume of the text, the percentage of uniqueness is below 80%.
Still, the signals are only recommendations, and perhaps in this case, the mute was too strict, what do you think?
Thank you.
I am now watching his post - it is very short, because of this, apparently 75% of uniqueness.
It is obvious that the author took a paragraph of text and redid it a little. But not enough to make the check fail. Due to the small total volume of the text, the percentage of uniqueness is below 80%.
Still, the signals are only recommendations, and perhaps in this case, the mute was too strict, what do you think?