You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem-Travelers. Check for uniqueness: Less than 80%, additional verification needed
Thank you for your comment.
Have you guaranteed that this post is really plagiarism?.
Checks draw the attention of moderators and community administrators. The check is for uniqueness, but not for plagiarism. Plagiarism is a more complex concept, and the decision about it can be made by the administrator or moderator.
So, this is not about the definition of plagiarism, but about the definition of non-uniqueness.
My checking manually, shows no plagiarism to the link you entered.
You can check it yourself using the site https://content-watch.ru/text/
Text uniqueness: 88.0%
http://thespicerouteend.com/west-sumatra-bukittinggi-travel-guide/ 8.8%
https://www.traveloka.com/en-id/activities/indonesia/city/padang-101687 8.1%
Thanks for your confirmation. Great job !
Some vocabularies may get the same, it is related to addresses, objects, or subjects that are commonly used on external webs.
So, if we review travel posts, we might find the same vocabulary from several external websites. However, that doesn't mean they are plagiarizing.
Unless they have quoted it directly from an external web, it can be categorized as plagiarism.
This post not plagiarism,
Cc @willeusz @rafaelcmontero
Thanks for checking. My goal is to inform about uniqueness below 80%, but it is important to make the final decision only after manual verification.
Thanks again.
@ponpase is right, non uniqueness Is about data relates to names, address, or historical facts. I don't think we have plagiarism here. @rafaelcmontero