Trump signs memo ending 'catch and release' immigration policy and warns California for sanctuary cities.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum on Friday ordering the end of a policy, known as “catch and release,” in which illegal immigrants are released from detention while awaiting a court hearing on their status.
As part of the memo, Trump asked Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to produce a list of military facilities that could be used to detain illegal immigrants.
President Trump is getting tough on immigration with closing the loophole thiis gives the border patrol and the US military more authority when they catch illegals crossing the border.
The wall has plenty of funding like Trump said in his speech a couple of days ago and is going to be built in order to secure the border. It's not just illegals the wall will keep out. It will make is harder for shipments of drugs coming up from the south and guns being sent down to Mexico for the drug cartels. It won't be perfect but it will be a step in the right direction of US to regaining it's sovereignty from years under Globalism.
Trump also talked tough about California in this video. California is not following federal law with it's sanctuary cities laws and they have a big problem with illegal voting too. I have a sneaky suspicion that the politicians in California will give in to Trump's demands once the Justice Department starts investigating voter fraud in the state.
We are seeing the restoring of the Republic before our eyes.
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Relevance: Sharing the truth
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by wakeupnd from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.
thank you friend information.
I like you post
I already foresee the lefts legal challenge to this
possibly trying to use the Posse Comitatus Act. And given how judges often rule their feelz/bribes rather than constitutionally, I wouldn't be shocked to see this tied up in court long enough to outwait his presidency.
California plays a dangerous game. Almost from its inception, the federal government made clear that their word was law, trumping any ideas that states would have in conflict with theirs. Made evident in the civil war, the truth is we replaced one group of royalty (England) with another (Feds).
It would be interesting if the feds decided to use Ca as an example and withdraw all funding, all military personnel down to the extreme minimum necessary for the safety of the bases and formed a border with them requiring papers to cross into the rest of the U.S.
The Feds were always the Agents of the King.
https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-Ig65tnTGOlAxofs0/free%20sovereign%20and%20independent_djvu.txt
While I agree with several of the statements made in that article, it is clear that the author is wrong when it comes to one declaring oneself a sovereign being within the jurisdiction of the United States. There are many who have tried such tactics via what became labeled the Freeman movement, and to my knowledge many went to prison for asserting their sovereignty and not paying to Caesar what was demanded.
I also suspect that the United States did in fact become their own sovereignty under international law, solidifying their ability to do so when they clamped down on the states so they could extract the money borrowed for the war with England. I am of the belief that We the People has not and never will include anyone not a signature or relative of one on those contracts. It would explain why common citizens (subjects) are denied constitutional rights regularly in the courts.
That's not what the author said at all. The United States is a country, or a region of land, like the North American Continent is also a region of land, nobody is declaring themselves "a sovereign being within the jurisdiction of the United States." They are declaring themselves Free, Sovereign and Independent as one of the progenies of the People of the United States, a region of land.
Except that this doesn't tell us anything, least if what they went to prison for was a lawful judgement, so what is the point, especially since we don't have an Emperor.
Which courts are those? American Common Law Courts? It doesn't explain anything, because clearly, We The People included everyone that fought, not only those that signed, and which United States are you talking about? The Unincorporated continental united States? The United States Confederacy, the Federation? The Incorporated Federal United States, the Territorial United States? Or which of the three bankrupted entities that called themselves the United States?
Skip to page 186-188 and read the speech gave before The United States of America (inc) Congress:
https://www.scribd.com/document/100879878/We-The-Sheeple-Vs-the-Banksters
Instead of trying to debate you, which I obviously do not have the information to do I will say this before saving your link for later study. In order to be a truly free and sovereign being there is a degree of recognition required by those with the power to send guns in to kidnap or murder you. Now whether they are called this version of the US or that version doesn't really matter as to the end result to the idea of one being sovereign.
There is another user here who is pretty knowledgeable who introduced me to some ideas about We the People (not his ideas, he merely passed them on). Based on the blatant disregard I see from the government when the constitution applies to the common citizen, it begins to fit with the walks like a duck, talks like a duck scenario.
I appreciate the recommendation ,thanks.
Absolutely nobody has the "power" to murder you, so when you speak about thugs with guns, you might as well ask ANY gang for a degree of recognition or demand your sovereignty from whatever murdering psychopaths you wish.
Now to exemplify how there is NOTHING to debate about what I said:
Either the people you vie for their recognition are Oath Takers, or they are Lawlessness, and either way, if you WANT that recognition it is your DUTY to establish lawfulness and secure your own Freedom, peace and make the demands you need upon all those that Serve you.
To end the debate completely, you are either a Citizen who has DUTIES to the state, or are a Sovereign, who has DUTIES to themselves, and can nobody Serve two masters and NEVER shall the role of Master and Servant be confused. Come back to this thread and start at the beginning with what I said and make notes of everything that interests you, including this:
http://annavonreitz.com/writofquowarranto.pdf
(that's about the only article on that website that isn't directly credited to Judge Anna, all the rest are dripping with information)
As little ago as 1988 the states where recognized as individual countries. Now people think that the Federals have magical powers to force the individual states to recognize the Federal over the State. Sad really that people do not comprehend their form of government enough to recognize an attack upon the Republic.