Tucker Carlson Calls the White House and Congress Fools!
In the following clip, Tucker Carlson airs out Zuckerberg as the fascist, censorship-happy, ban hammer-wielding monster that he is.
Calling into question Mark’s business decision to gag Americans based on their diverse political ideologies, Tucker takes a common sense approach in his criticism of the far left’s attempt to muzzle those whose opinions don’t fall in lockstep with Silicon Valley's monolithic philosophy. Here we see Carlson speak truth to power, shaming them as they deserve.
At the end of the video, Tucker speaks in condemnation of both Congress and the White House as “fools” for either dropping the ball or turning a blind eye because they have yet to be affected by the purge of verboten people, those with so-called dangerous opinions. What was once a free marketplace of ideas now resembles a fragile ecosystem of neurotic one-trick ponies whose only game is to feign righteous indignation.
If you ask me, it’s refreshing to see a man with a pair to spare, get on the air, and say the king has no clothes. However, Fox News is going the way of the dinosaur. If you’ve seen it once, you’ll recognize it time and time again. The media company, just like many in the past, is reversing polarity and veering hard left leaving only a couple of stragglers remaining to keep the ship afloat. Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson are of a dying breed who will no doubt find employment elsewhere when their contracts go unrenewed.
Until then, I’m afraid we must wait for the Trump administration to “do something about it” and I hope he will not regulate these worthless social media companies, but rather cancel his account very publicly. He can do this while encouraging others to do the same. If Trump led by example, it would serve as a great inspiration to others, and Fakebook’s anti-American pro-censorship policies will cause it to become so unpopular that it will finally begin to fail in the marketplace.
If in the mid-’50s people could organize a boycott of the bus system at a great inconvenience, but in the 2010s we can’t even muster the oomph to abandon a social media company, then we’ve become pathetic beyond redemption and deserve whatever is in store for us should we fail to act.
We already know that Zuckerberg thinks you are a dumb fuck for giving him all of your data, and he said this before he even started selling it. What are you waiting for, cancel your account today!
Don't be a dumb fuck, get out and watch it burn!
The Montgomery Bus Boycott
Delete your Fakebook account today!
I completely disagree with this character.
The congress are not fools.
They KNOW which side of the bread is buttered.
The people that OWN this country, heretofor know as T.H.E.Y. (The US is a corporation. Who owns its voting shares?)
also own all the media and all the big-tech firms.
Zuck didn't invent anything. The idea was floating around. There were several people actually trying to be f-c-book. However, only f-c-book seemed to get advertising deals and money out of thin air to continue to stay in business.
T.H.E.Y. own the country, and the media, AND all the big corps that would pay big money for advertising. Ever notice that all the small websites never attract Coca-Cola® adverts?
So, my conclusion is that the congress-critters are doing exactly what they are told. They were told to make a media circus with Zuck, they did so.
But, the name of the game is controlling the narrative.
And T.H.E.Y. will do anything, and go to any lengths, to control the narrative.
If you are correct, the only thing
left to do is cancel these accounts.
P.S. your comment reminded me of:
^ All the more reason to cancel.
war of the words by pots and kettles...... lolz
Perhaps they are pots and kettles, but
that wouldn't negate the facts. Cont...
Yes, you just triggered me to write that. BTW,
not calling you a ZC but are you a ZC? [¬º-°]¬
Brains, they want you to abandon your brain
in favor of virtual reality, and social whatevs.
The facts are they create these 'teams' for us to join and we spend far more time bickering which is the lesser of the two evils, 'fighting over the breadcrumbs while they make away with the loaf'.
Do i have a FB account ? yeah, hosting images there is great, i also see what people are doing and saying on there, do i write or post, nope... so what, wanna fight about it :P
but why i hear you ask? well for the same reason i am part of both 'skeptics of the universe' and 'spirit science', same reason i watch 'real' news and 'fake' news, etc....
If you stop observing both sides of an argument or turn your back on 'the enemy', then you are grossly unaware of what they are doing...
but as far as the whole politics, media, social structure shit goes... its all WWE... and playing into it is like backing a wrestler as if its a real fight
lolz
Na man, I couldn't ever fight a zuckcuck, that wouldn't be right. Actually, I disagree somewhat, and it may have to do with regional differences. The type of freedom of speech I'm talking about boycotting Fakebook for are things that some countries have already banned in real life. So, if I put myself in the shoes of someone from one of those countries, it may be a moot point. Yet, from my geographic perspective, the online world is an extension of the reality on the ground, and if we allow the censorship to go through without opposing it, or without lauding those who do, it will only lead to the type of acclimation that will make it possible for the legislature to try and get away with it IRL. In short, if freedom of speech is to survive on the land, then the company needs to bleed out financially, and the only way this can happen is with a boycott, boycott, boycott.
The PC army has been marching for years and perpetuated by the media in glaringly obvious examples... brain abandonment happened a long time ago.
free speech, free thinking... hell freedom in general died a long time ago, we have just been far too stupid to realize it because we have been chasing foolish ideals and dreams dictated by the social/societal norms, gov., etc.
As i said i think its all a shit show stage production to make us believe we still have 'some good ones out there fighting for us'. its misdirection that gives us the perception we have a choice in the matters. but all we have is the illusion of choice...
fact is if they dont get people with one hoodwink, bamboozle, flim flam, or gambit... they just morph into another rendition of the same model, with another name and a different angle.... Devils Advocate stylez
Treat the disease not the symptoms... the world needs an enema :P
I'm not advocating that people should vote. I cannot do that in good conscience knowing that political leaders, almost without exception, will use government to lie, cheat, murder, and steal. However, I will talk unfavorably about whom I perceive to be the greater evil, and more favorably about who I perceive to be the lesser of the two, and these are just observations I put out there.
As for American values, Trump has seemingly caused the technocrats to go full retard and censorship wild. In the 2004 election where we had two Bonesman running against each other, I would agree with that picture above. In the 2016 election, something very unique happened. Instead of a run of the mill politico, we got a brash businessman willing to work in the interest of the people and unafraid to speak his mind. In short, we got a taste of what it's like when a real person gets elected into office.
I think what people don’t understand, is that new presidents step into a concrete world where they’re bound by all the contracts signed by their predecessors, and should they violate said contracts, it may put the country in financial peril, or even worse. We don’t have access to the reality of the situation. Many times, people can be simple-minded, and they think in terms of black and white. They think the President is their daddy, and daddy is the boss, and what daddy says goes.
The reality of the situation is the United States is a corporation, and the president is the CEO, He doesn't even sit on the board of directors, he's there at their service, a public face for a corporate entity, and his powers are limited in their scope. Would I rather see a sitting president who doesn't want to go full 1984? Yes, I very much would! Can Donald Trump pull it off, and bring an end to the censorship, or a new beginning to freedom of online expression? Time will tell I suppose, but I know if it was Hillary the fight would already be lost.
When and if we do win, I'll be sure to remind you to follow our example for extra freedom of expression around your part of the global neighborhood. Pardon me while I go REEE myself to sleep for saying "global neighborhood."
Oh, and what is "the disease?"
im not saying you are advocating for people to vote... im saying its all part of the same game... the game to keep us divided by arguing over things that dont matter.... the agenda is set... no matter who the 'leader' is
I think there is alot to be said for style of leadership. To say the agenda is set might be an oversimplification. Perhaps some of an agenda is set but whether we get there are not may have everything to do with who is at the helm. If Trump was steadfast and true to the entire agenda he wouldn't be catching anywhere near the static he is right now. If you think the lefts' efforts against trump is a charade then we're watching two different episodes. I'm sure there are many goals TPTB want accomplished, some that Trump is willing to be part of and others that he's not. If it's financially retarded, I'm guessing he will oppose venomously.
Curated for #informationwar (by @thoughts-in-time)
Ways you can help the @informationwar!