Amazing and thorough comment, good Sir! Yeah, I wouldn't go so far as to try and tell people that their lifestyle choices are almost certainly due to the veritable chemical bombardment that we are all (for the most part) being subjected to. The reason I wouldn't go there is that before the five letters club became popularized, there were plenty of organically gay people, but they were just more few and far between. Whether or not the phenomenon going back throughout the ages can be attributed to environmental/chemical causations is unknown as far as I'm concerned.

The intentional cultural push of the alternative lifestyle choices is no doubt programming children to see choices where they previously would not have been, and this is resulting in more people choosing from the various paths because of the programming. It wouldn't at all surprise me if persons, corporate or otherwise, who own stake in various companies like the aforementioned, actively push for these cultural changes to secure the longevity of their profitable culling spree.

Now that the Chinese own it, the largest stakeholder is the Chinese government. The Chinese buyout of the said company occurred on June 26, 2017. To be clear, I generally disagree that there should be any type of discrimination towards the five-letter group, but I see the widespread almost religious and zealous promotion of it along with changes in sexual education courses as antithetical towards the American populace's replacement rate. In addition to that, we are breaching new territories when biological men can destroy competitions designed for women in the traditional sense of the word.

UPDATE:

I forgot to address your point about testosterone, further evidence that suggests there's a war on masculinity is gleaned from the fact that normal testosterone throughout the decades is determined based on a sliding scale. So, for example, if a doctor were to discover a problem with your endocrine system and prescribed testosterone as a treatment, he or she would try and elevate your T levels to current levels.

An individual's T levels might be 30% low according to today's norms, but if you compare that to 50 years ago, it would take a lot more testosterone to satisfy a 30% deficit. So basically, any fix to low t that an individual might receive today might still result in a somewhat effeminate male in comparison to someone who may have been treated for the same condition many years ago.

What might be interesting to find out is if there is someone whose been on this kind of treatment for decades and then get a history of their prescription changes. If the EPA is going to allow an additional 50% more atrazine to the water "as safe," then you can expect a marked increase in effeminate males, which will no doubt influence their life choices.