Stealing a duck gets 7 years in prison, stealing $ 300 thousand is recommended for 3 years in prison

in #informationwar4 years ago

Well, it's not that you are reading it wrong and this comparison is not without foundation, maybe even give more examples for this comparison. There are many similar cases to compare, the poor with a small offense and small consequences often receive a high sentence, the rich with great damage often receive low sentences.
Untitled.jpg
At about 0h5 on February 15, 2016, Khang and Kiet were drinking, then the food ran out, and Khang invited Kiet to go back to drink. At the time, Khang and Kiet carried two knives and when meeting Ngan's flock of ducks, Khang took out a knife to threaten and told Kiet to come and catch a duck to make a drink. With this behavior on March 16, 2017, the People's Court (TAND) of Chau Thanh district sentenced Nguyen Van Khang (born in 1997, residing in Phuoc Chung hamlet, Mong Tho commune) to 7 years in prison for "robbing property".
Explore more: https://dantri.com.vn/phap-luat/mot-thanh-nien-lanh-7-nam-tu-vi-bat-1-con-vit-ve-nhau-20170317120025005.htm

In January 2016, MobiFone announced the purchase of 95% of AVG's shares. The Government Inspectorate later determined that this purchase was a very serious economic violation. The project has a total investment of VND 8,900 billion, but violations, violations of regulations and irresponsibility of MobiFone lead to the risk of existing serious damage to the State's capital at this enterprise about VND 7.006 billion (Equivalent to $300,000,000). By taking a bribe, Mr. Vu has achieved the appropriation of the difference when transferring AVG compared to its real value. And currently Mr. Vu is being asked to serve a 3-5 year prison term for giving bribes, the court does not mention the crime of appropriating the difference. What is even more ironic is that the domestic newspaper is reporting that many organizations and individuals are applying for a sentence reduction for Mr.Vu (The news is about 2000 people) that's ridiculous.
Explore more: https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ph%E1%BA%A1m_Nh%E1%BA%ADt_V%C5%A9

What do you think about these two sentences?

Connect with me on other foundation

facebook || youtube || twitter || blogger || wordpress || d.tube || minds || reddit || linkedin || tumblr || instagram

🔥🔥🔥
Follow me to get minimum 1 follow from @anhvu & daily random upvotes from the @hoaithu's Curation Trail

💰💰💰
If you want to earn more rewards with your Steemit account, you can refer to the ways from
this post
.

Recent posts

Sort:  

Murder vs Theft:

Some people think murder is worse than theft. Well, murder is the theft of life. I treasure the life of people over the life of animals.

I'm Not Vegan

I eat animals. I try not to torture animals. But you can kill animals without making them suffer. I wonder if Vietnamese treasure animals more than people or equal to people. The robber stole more money than the duck is worth. If that was a murder of a human, that might be different.

Equality Deception

One of the problems in the world is that of equality. Some people say we are equal to the animals. But we are not animals. But if we were animals, then 7 years in prison might sound fair from that perspective. I wonder if some of the Vietnamese laws can be changed or not.

In fact, when you look at the rules of the law you can see that it is very fair. The problem is that its implementation is unfair. I think the reason is because the three rights in Vietnam are not as independent as other countries.

Regarding murder: In the duck case, life-threatening. The country's robbery of $ 300,000,000 is a tax robbery of the entire people, when our country is poor, this money will indirectly kill many people.

For now, I will skip the murder, only in terms of robbery. You see this case: robbing 2 loaves of bread, not using weapons. Taking place in 2016, note that the defendants are not yet 18 years old.
Capture.PNG
See more

Duck Value:

But in reality, a duck is only worth whatever a duck is worth when you sell the duck plus the value of the eggs from the duck, right?

Ownership

In reality, the duck is not owned by the people because ownership means the right to murder what you own, which government says you don't have the right to do.

Ownership Means Freedom

If the people own the duck, then that means the murderer of the duck also owned the duck.

Cannot Punish Owners For Owning

Therefore, the owner cannot be punished for doing whatever the owner wants to do. Because real ownership means the freedom to do anything with what is owned, good or bad, if you own it, then you can do anything with it. Punishing owners for owning is an insult to the principles to what it means to own something.

Land Renters

Same thing with how land owners are generally just land renters in reality. I wonder how many people can grasp that if everybody owned something, then nobody owns it except for government.

Who Owned The Duck?

Well, technically, wouldn't the farmer of the duck be the only owner?

Owning a Television

Imagine telling Vietnamese people that every Vietnamese person owns this one television. So, owner 1 one turns on the TV. But then owner 2 turns off the TV. Owner 3 turns it to channel 5. But then owner 4 turns it to channel 42. And then it becomes a fight if everybody were to own the same TV or the same duck. And how would you decide who was right? Who would make the final decision? DO you have a vote to decide what to do with the TV or the duck, if everybody owned it? I don't understand how people can believe that everybody can own something.

Merry Christmas @joeyarnoldvn :) Thanks all!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 64615.49
ETH 3112.63
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.84