House Judiciary Holding Hearing Considering Further Central Planning of Social Media

in informationwar •  3 months ago

Well gang it sounds like the bureaucrats in the DC swamp think the central planning mix with coercion that is state intervention may need further interference in the voluntary association of humankind. Now don't get me wrong the social media giants like Facebook and Twitter are likely not positive if not negative net effect for human freedom at this point in time, but I am very skeptical that more gun backed state intervention is likely a useful means toward achieving a better world subject to how one might define better.

As someone who likes MIT licensed open source steemit where everything is publicly available on a blockchain thus making censorship and shadowbanning less likely and more discoverable and possibly more recorded in the record it would definitely be great if scandals are discovered. It will be interesting how all these things play out. Ultimately it will be interesting how it all plays out and what comes of these discussions and whether the DC swamp decides to adopt new regulations to further subsidize entrenched market actors and increase the transaction cost of new market participants as typifies the crony statism of our day.

Source


https://judiciary.house.gov/hearing/facebook-google-and-twitter-examining-the-content-filtering-practices-of-social-media-giants/

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Very well written and informative article. You are very well versed in writing. Keep up the good work. Thanku

·

I'm just a bullshitter with a key bored.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Well done friend ,you have shared the good inormatiom among your friends,thanks. plse leave a up vote

·

recommend not begging for upvotes, some people downvote that

Yo! As someone who has been exploring 5+ countries (two of them communist) on a mountain bike for over a decade I am developing a greater appreciation for the system in the U.S. - that is, when it is PROPERLY WORKING; which it HASN'T been for quite some time. In communist countries this debate would likely NOT even be happening, and so it is somewhat promising to see that the government is at addressing the issue. In an attempt to TRY to hang on to some optimism, the promosing news is that the Trump administration has CLEARLY expressed their openness to exploring blockchain technology, and blockchain will likely be the primary solution to these censorship related issues. One company to look at right now is Civic : https://www.civic.com

·

Looks interesting will have to check out more, the mountain biking sounds pretty cool. I think one can definitely do central planning and it isn't necessarily guaranteed too be a total disaster like many people seem to assert? But I think the free market system is generally better and works best when combined with sufficient structures (that do not necessarily need to be financed by state coercion) premised upon enlightened voluntary self interest as the premise for organizing society that guarantees sufficient individual dignity is best.

Ultimately I think letting the market decide on social networking is likely if not always the best strategy compared to letting bureaucrats in a room talk about it for a few days and then put in coercively backed regulations that are typically written behind closed doors and most importantly backed by insitutionalized state violence.