CNN in a recent article discusses @thejimmydoreshow thusly in a recent article published April 20, 2018 by Paul P. Murphy, Kaya Yurieff and Gianluca Mezzofiore:

"Ads also appeared on The Jimmy Dore Show channel, a far-left YouTube channel that peddles conspiracy theories, such as the idea that Syrian chemical weapons attacks are hoaxes."

It is interesting for the fake news king to attack anyone else as fake news and without evidence. If Jimmy Dore has peddled in conspiracy theory why not engage in basic journalism and actually cite evidence of your claims? Is there not evidence of chemical weapons events being not accurately reported in the past? What are some journalists claiming? What did Theodore Postol claim about reporting on previous attacks?

If these claims are true and we must risk WWIII with a nuclear armed power possibly joined by China, in the name of not using chemical weapons--in the context of the numerous times the failing New York Times has reported ISIS to use chemical weapons, why not show they evidence? How is asking for evidence conspiracy theory since that is all I have seen on Jimmy Dore's show,

Has Jimmy Dore claimed he went to Syria or holds first hand recollection of these events? If one news agency is going to attack another as fake news conspiracy theorists, why not actually cite the evidence if clear? Are readers supposed to just ipse dixit imagine that the three people it took to write the article are correct to attack another reporter's credibility?

This article probably best sums up what is wrong wit ur news currently the most, is that you read it and there is no substance and almost all speculation. You read it and cannot cite evidence, other than just the authority of the article's author. And you know they did such a good time in the past with all the times. They get stuff wrong.

Assange continues to be silenced, for nearly a month now., Very messed up. And they got nearly 1% of us behind bars in Murca, many for victimless conduct. Hopefully we will be free someday. But I suspect CNN would not be part of a free world, behind being part of some theme park of the orwellian mis information period of western civilization.

Jimmy Dore points out Rand Paul is on CNN questioning evidenceless Syria claims, but is not painted as conspiracy theorist--which is odd? Why is CNN not consistent in the way it claims reality to be?

Sources

http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/19/technology/youtube-ads-extreme-content-investigation/index.html

Author unlicenses any copyright interest in this article, but also does not give any warranties

Any copyrightable material created by the article’s author is released into the public domain. Images and video used are from Pixabay and other sources and may also be unlicensed. If you have questions about what this means and what you can do perhaps hire an attorney since your law is so complex.