You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 157 of World's 200 Richest Entities Are Now Corporations
Dow Seeks to Expand Use of Bee-killing Pesticide to Additional 3 Million Acres
try to address this instead... no bees no food... follow the money of course
yep $300 for the "money-free society banner " :) Money will be there until the transition has reached a critical mass
According to a report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture released Tuesday, honeybee populations are on the rise. As of April, an estimated 2.89 million bee colonies existed across the U.S., an increase of 3 percent compared to April 2016
The cause of the past decrease in bee population has so far been impossible to pin down. Therefore you can't know the answer... :-D
Maybe try following the money spent to correct the problem.
https://www.newsweek.com/bees-population-colony-endangered-species-645694
U.S. Department of Agriculture, from an agency that has allowed corporations take over the world/USA... yeah sure :)
spraying pesticides is good for nature... lol ... just like glyposate on crops...
the bees die off is based on commercial hives, whose numbers are known.. so it does have too an impact on wild bees.
dow, monsanto, bayer, all the same criminals
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/09/honeybees-dying-insecticide-harvard-study
you have consistently resort to "data" that gives corporate criminals a pass. NO WOO-WOO, you are simply in denial that there is an agenda against humanity and nature, and that is where transhumanism fits in... even when Eloan Musk TELLS it like it is, you look the other way. So any data you post here points to your denial.
In-hive Pesticide Exposome: Assessing risks to migratory honey bees from in-hive pesticide contamination in the Eastern United States... Our results fly in the face of one of the basic tenets of toxicology: that the dose makes the poison. We found that the number of different compounds was highly predictive of colony death, which suggests that the addition of more compounds somehow overwhelms the bees’ ability to detoxify themselves.
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep33207
We were surprised to find such an abundance of fungicides inside the hives, but it was even more surprising to find that fungicides are linked to imminent colony mortality,” said Kirsten Traynor, a postdoctoral researcher in entomology at UMD and lead author on the study. “These compounds have long been thought to be safe for bees. We’re seeing them at higher doses than the chemicals beekeepers apply directly to the colonies to control varroa mites. So that is particularly concerning.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161007115919.htm
Yep pesticides and glyphosate are are good for the environment... skyrocketing cancers and bees die off cannot be explained :)
its not called the 6th great extinction for no reason.. And amyone who listens to a scientist or politician with alegence to any political party is not thinking straight .
I lives in New Mexico for about 10 years, and knew several bee keepers, they ALL were baffled by the loss of bees
Pfft, what are those articles? They look like "mainstream data" to me...
You dumb mainstream data poster...they are all part of the conspiracy!!!
https://beebusters.com/resurging-bees/
looks a lot like all the PRO GLYPHOSATE DATA you showed me once... :)
because fiat money is not a conspiracy perhaps? certainly not on the site that you praise and which bashes Max Igan.
I can do without your data, but again, that is why you dont listen to Musk when he speaks of human 2.0... you are in denial, no doubt about it... you cannot even see that corporatism IS fascism.
This is the logical fallacy known as cherry picking, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence.
So you have found problems with their data gathering? Or do you just dismiss data that disagrees with you out of hand? Let's see, did the woo woo fear mongerer actually check out the facts? Or did she just post more bullshit? Hmm, this is a tough one.
Yes, and there are about 85,000 more hives than 2 years ago, or about 2.5 billion more bees. How does that happen when evil Monsanto and Bayer are killing all the bees?
Nobody has been able to determine why the bees died off. But somehow you know how AND who...
Can you share your scientific findings with us lesser mortals?
Is the Guardian a left or right publication?
Posted using Partiko Android
newsweek and guardian is left leaning... harvard is generally right leaning
but here is another study published by Nature Mag
https://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/10/proof-bee-safe-pesticides-cause-colony-die-off.html
spraying 3 million hectares will have dire consequences, should it go through
Insecticides are depleting the soul's fertility. The insects are no longer present in the soil. With their excretion insects fertilises the soil, in consequence the food taste better and is more nutritive.
In the absence of tasty food, the food industry has to add sugar and salt to make it "tastier".
Paradox: Sugar and salt will kill us, just like the insects - "The hunter becomes the hunted".
We can produce food without insecticide, using pairing technology. It just needs a paradigm shift and a will from governments, as such the people to educate themselves on this subject, and vote for the right politicians.
This said, politicians are only a reflection of the people. Politicians are bred from the people. The people have to change first, the politics will then follow.
In respect to money, there are 2 things that drive money, greed and jealousy in that order. The latter could lead others to think, amongst others, that those who contribute and express to the related perspectives of money are "hypocrites".
Maybe the Venus Project could be "the solution" to money?
I find everyone's post/discussion here "nutritive".
Thank you for continuing this passionate intellectual narrative everyone.
Posted using Partiko Android
Harvard left or right?
Posted using Partiko Android
Is News Week a left or right publication?
Posted using Partiko Android
depending, sometimes right or left tells the truth and then I compare their data with alternative outlets... and make up my mind. But since I am very aware of the divide and conquer, I often see by myself which data is closer to the truth
The truth will be told only if it suites ones agenda ..left or right.