You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What I've learned from a (pretty) close examination of "Flat Earth" theory.

in #informationwar5 years ago

tbh with you, if you are in Christ and have Him as your hope of salvation then cosmology doesn't matter, but it IS a fascinating topic and has been THE scientific question debated for thousands of years.

despite what people might think, people have been flat/ ball earthers or geo/ helio centric and arguing about it for a very long time, it is not a new phenomenon, and it certainly has not been settled.

one of the first things i realised was that i had not personally seen the earth as a ball, not been past 10 miles high, and everything in my mind-images about the universe and the earth were from pictures from a telescreen. no proof outside of this.

so what could i prove for myself? and what has forgotten science also proved? there are so many strands to this, and it took me 6 months of study and research to finally come out as believing the earth is not a spinning ball.

i honestly believe the fe debate has come about because God is waking more people up to His truth. many fe'rs are rabid new age cultists, but thousands have given testimony as to having gone from atheism or no idea-ism to a profound belief in scripture, the God of the bible (YHVH) being the Almighty Creator of heaven, earth and all life, and His only begotten human son Jesus of bethlehem being the only path to reconciliation and life in the coming eons, which are going to be much better than this one.

sorry i haven't talked about the topic much, i have done plenty of talking in the past.

different from the other link, this presentation has had over a million views, and it's just some bald bearded bloke making the connections between what you already knwo about the illuminati et al, and cosmology/ flat earth.

enjoy:

Sort:  

Thanks. I'll try to make time to squeeze this in tomorrow.

Oh my...this is 2 hours long.

I'm not going to be able to get to that this weekend, that's for sure.

I've looked at a LOT of the "no curvature" arguments, and I find them unconvincing. There is no way you are going to see curvature at less then 100 miles elevation (which balloons never reach) on an object with a diameter the size of the Earth.

Also, even the best "you shouldn't be able to see this from here" arguments fall flat when you realize you are not seeing the bottom of the objects claim, and the misuse of the formulas for recedence.

watch the first 15 minutes. if you're not interested, don't come back to it. the cover photo shows a number 5, meaning there are lots of different topics covered, not just curvature for two hours lol!

peace.

I'm semi-interested. Just too busy to devote two hours right now.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 61025.71
ETH 2726.09
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.45