Epistamolgy the science of knowing vs the fruad of Scietism.

Many people know about Etymology, which is the history of the creation of a word.   

etymology (ĕtˌə-mŏlˈə-jē)► 

• n. The origin and historical  development of a linguistic form as shown by determining its basic  elements, earliest known use, and changes in form and meaning, tracing  its transmission from one language to another, identifying its cognates  in other languages, and reconstructing its ancestral form where  possible. 
• n. The branch of linguistics that deals with etymologies. 

More at Wordnik   from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th  

                                                      Source: Pixabay

Few are familiar with the definition of :

epistemology (ĭ-pĭsˌtə-mŏlˈə-jē)► 

• n. The branch of philosophy that studies the nature of knowledge, its presuppositions and foundations, and its extent and validity. 

More at Wordnik   from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th  

                                                     Source: Pixabay

To put forth my basic comprehension allows one to realize the truth of how the scientific method has been high-jacked by a philosophy religion. The scientific method teaches that there must be to or more scientist involved in a experiment; claiming that just an experience is not valid science. Truthfully this is hyperbole, but leads to the ability of the philosophy religion to safe guard its beliefs that are not born out by experiment.  

For anyone who has studied epistemology knowing the origin of knowledge is based on the experience, claiming that only one experience doesn't count is ludicrous. It derives its power by denying the individual the right to put forth there experiments as evidence because of a none existent credibility issue.  It harms society by striping the individual of the right to challenge the philosophy religions beliefs, which goes against the tenets of the Scientific Method and makes its practitioners religious in nature. 

                                                   Source: Pixabay

Science is based off of the experience of the scientist. This is not to say that two is not better than one, but the claim denies the role of experience in science and is not based upon experiments itself.  By down playing the experiences role it minimizes the individual by denying the individuals ability to perform valid experiments and following the evidence where ever it leads. 

The obvious conclusion is that this was done to control what gets published in the annuals of science, putting forth a fraud upon society to protect special interest. This is the welfare of the philosophy religion designed specifically to divide science from the vested interest of the individuals in society. It is obvious that this is the divide and concur strategy of the elite.

                                                  Source: Pixabay

What do you think of the philosophy religions destructive influence upon societies?

Fight the divide  Join the nonviolent fight for our freedom. 

                                                                        Steemian style  informationwar