Nobody can make it go away. Intellectual Dishonesty is what you're doing, calling it an attack when someone simply booed at someone. You keep saying Steemit when I think you mean Steem, but calling content curated by default as Hidden (on one Frontend)/replaced with a "reveal" button that serves as a warning of Questionable Content Ahead as Removal or otherwise Suppression of Speech is Intellectual Dishonesty because No such Suppression of Speech happened and nobody was censored and nothing was removed, in fact, this so called:censorship: and :suppression: is so effective that incidentally no one was either Suppressed or Censored, Ever on Steem. Literally you Conceptualize that "downvoting" is the highest expression as you call it... and you want people to not be allowed to have such an expression, while you RALLY for freedom of Expression, but not without Name Calling and Stereotyping and Mind Reading others because of their Expression and calling for the End of their Expression.