Quit calling them Immigrants. Quit calling them Illegal Immigrants. Call them what they are: Invaders...
In the distant past people would defend their lands from invaders. Who were these invaders? They were not friendly people that wanted to come to the land and merge, coexist, and become something greater. They typically had their own ideas and they wanted to impose them upon the lands they invaded. If their might was superior they would perhaps enslave, loot, RAPE, murder, etc. This was a very overt (obvious) form of invader.
It is a large part of the reason people built walls. It is a large part of the reason people needed armies to defend themselves, or militia.
Immigration still occurred. It usually involved people arriving or being invited and learning the culture, the language, and bringing something beneficial to their new home. They didn't arrive with the intentions of forcing all of the people that were already there to CHANGE. If they wanted it to be like the place they came from, why would they immigrate?
Well there is a type of person that would show up. Expect change, and be fine with making a new place behave as the place they came from. That describes invaders fairly well.
We have entered a very nefarious and covert (hidden) technique of invasion. It is largely fueled by politicians. It can be for various reasons, but one of them is that if they give these invaders voting rights it is likely those invaders will vote for them. Thus, if they want to insure they keep their political job and power some of them have this sick method of thinking that enables them to justify allowing invaders into the country.
They take it a step further. If people complain about the invaders they pass laws to make it illegal to talk about the invaders. "I saw them come through the gates and I saw them rape a woman"... "Throw that man into jail! He didn't see anything!" "Maam, what about the rape?" "That is part of their culture. Throw anyone that mentions it into jail!"
Seems much like some corrupt politician throwing the city gates wide and inviting the raping and pillaging invaders into the city.
The more I consider this the more this seems to fit the model for what we are seeing.
A lot of Politically Correct word hijacking will occur to make it seem as though anyone protesting these invaders (aka illegal immigrants) is actually anti-Immigrant. Nothing can be further from the truth. The lie here is that they have taken the concept of INVADERS and tried to normalize it so it means the same thing as Immigrant.
Invaders often get special benefits and deals that the rest of the citizens do not. Any legal immigrants also don't get these special benefits. The invaders though will get special treatment. It might be as simple as calling the children of the invaders (often not children at all but in their 20s) "Dreamers" and giving them essentially free education or far better opportunities than the children of actual citizens.
When the program robbing the citizens to pay for this education for the invaders is protested in the form of the NOT LAW named DACA the politicians and their media propaganda engine swing into overdrive and try to tug on your heart strings of how we can't stop helping the "Dreamers".
Here is a simple question. Do you think invaders dream?
Yeah they do. They likely dream about the opportunities to loot, rape, and get free things. Why make your citizens pay to encourage such behavior?
Do you think your own citizens dream? Yes. So why give the free or low cost stuff to invaders which is not really free, it is paid for by stealing from your citizens and redistributing what is stolen? Why don't you give actual citizens the same rights you give invaders?
The real question is why you are so power hungry greedy and evil that you spin invaders into being a positive...
Or are you just that stupid?
I would encourage everyone to look for the root cause of immigration rather than the symptoms which is what this post does. Treating the symptoms will not fix the problem. Fixing the root cause will and the root cause is zionism.
Below is a video from Barbara Sceptre. She is the founder and director of an organization called Paieda. In the video she states that Jews are playing a leading role in making Europe become multicultural and while people don't like it they will get used to it and they have no choice because Europe must become multicultural - ironically Israel does not allow a non-Jew to marry a Jew or allow a non-Jew to immigrate.
Who does Sceptre (and other zionists) think that they are to be telling other people what they must do while they themselves do the exact opposite to what they want others to do?
Zionist ambitions are achieved by manufacturing a war on terror, destablizing the middle east via terror, using the USA and other nations to fight proxy wars for Israel which drives people out out of their nations and into other countries so as to escape persecution. Christians have been living peacefully in Syria for hundreds of years but they have been hunted by islamic extremists that are backed by US and Israel and they have very few options left other than to leave and go somewhere else.
Then we have Europe and other nations opening their borders for them. Then the media steps in and gets the local people to resent the immigrants that are arriving in their country. It is a classic and very obvious case of Divide & Conquer.
If you research the Kalergi Plan you will see that the genocide of white europe via immigration was planned almost 100 years ago and it called for mass immigration of foreigners into Europe. Today this plan is being carried out as intended so it should not be a surprise to anyone. Western governments began relaxing their immigration laws in the 1960's but the zionists want immigration to happen quicker which is why they have destablized the middle east.
The reason that we have problems in the middle east is because Zionists want to take over all of the land that you see in the map below because they believe that God gave it to them and that he has given them a mandate to remove non-Jews from 'their' land.
You state that you are anti-invasion and not anti-immigration and I think that is an excellent distinction. Likewise, I am not anti-semitic but rather anti-zionism.
Watch the video and listen carefully to what Sceptre has to say on immigration and the leading role that Jews are playing. Always look for the cause is my advice and don't get bogged down looking at the symptoms.
Aren't all groups of human beings immigrants or invader at some point in time. Does the planet not belong to all people's?
I don't think I should be messing with other countries. I also don't see Zionism as the ONLY problem. It is A problem. Yet, in your own nation you can either choose to allow refugees, invaders, or legal immigrants if you want REGARDLESS of ZIONISM. If you have a problem with zionism in your nation then do something about it there. Yet, that doesn't mean I should suddenly be obligated to give you a home if you become a refugee. I could choose to. Yet in choosing to give you a home I in no way should be expected to change my country to FIT your desires. Giving you a home should be seen as something to be thankful for rather than becoming an invader. Regardless of Zionism.
Also to be clear I am not anti-Semitic. Zionism is a specific aspect of Jewish society and there are even Jews that are anti-Zionist.
I agree with much of what you are saying and I get where you are coming from. Immigrants should integrate into the local culture and most of them do.
Zionism is not the only problem but it is the main problem by more than a hundredfold IMHO. I haven't calculated it precisely but just making the point that it is the biggest problem that the world faces today.
Zionists control the UN, and almost every government in the world including Russia, China, North Korea, Hamas and ISIS. They control almost every world leader and it's becoming increasingly difficult to avoid the net they are casting globally. Furthermore, most of the 'problems' that we see with immigration are either isolated incidents not representative of the majority of immigrants or they are totally manufactured stories that aren't even true, or the perpetrators of immigrant incidents are in some cases actors.
One of the problems that we have with speaking out against zionism is that the powers that shouldn't be and the Jewish lobbies label anti-zionists as anti-semites and guilty of hate speech when nothing could be further from the truth. This is only going to get worse as zionism spreads.
One just has to google 'jews against zionism' to find many anti-zionist Jews. Furthermore, there are zionist christians and muslims that have been poisoned. Zionism is the most dangerous ideology in the world today.
Awesome - finally and for the first time I've seen it in 18 months on Steemit - zionism being fully called out!
http://www.frot.co.nz/design/sift/the-true-cost-of-israel/
there is a legal method for attacking the illegals "support" system
DHS may start doing it's job, arresting the politicians running "sanctuary" cities - PUSH THEM TO DO IT!
It is both insulting and frustrating to LEGAL immigrants who try to do things the right way when the main stream media bundle legal and illegal together and just refer to them as a combined "immigrants"
There is that too. I agree completely. I mentioned that citizens and LEGAL immigrants don't get the same benefits as these "Dreamer's".
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance:Why is Invasion being sold as a good thing?
Calling immigrants, people who leave their home because of war and genocide invaders is just wrong.
And who is the "they" you are talking about? Is it one, two or thousands of people that you've got to know that raped, murdered? If thats the case may I ask you what kind of person you are that you get in contact with so many of them?
All I can see in that post of yours is generalization. You cant say "they" on a topic like that.
I live in Germany. There are around 1.5 million refugees around here. Would you title them as "they" who rape and murder?
There might be some of them who have the evil character to do so. But you can't say that because one of 100.000 would do it, that everyone would do it.
It's like saying one of 100.000 priests sexually harassed a child - All priests are child rapists. Sound like bullshit hm? But that's exactly what you are doing in your post.
You are looking for an enemy to blame. Nothing else. I don't know what you try to blame one him but doing won't fix your problem.
It's kinda pitiable...
The real question is to who belongs the earth.
Not you, not a state or a government, no state union. It belongs to nobody. People just claim that it belongs to someone and others accept it, or not.
So is people blindly falling for appeals to authority and allowing people to convince them that invaders are not invaders.
EDIT: Though I am tired of worrying about offending people, political correctness, etc. That shit is rotting the minds of people around the world.
It is not pity that I have. It is rage at the indoctrination and mass application of propaganda to dumb down the population and make them so ignorant of basic critical thinking, and a good knowledge of history, AND the scientific method.
Aren't all groups of human beings immigrants or invader at some point in time. Does the planet not belong to all people?
No. And nature backs that up. Ants declare territory. Dogs, Cats, Bears, and actually many animals mark and defend their territory.
Also if they move without intent to assimilate into their new environment they are not an immigrant. They are an invader.
You asked to stick to logic. This statement of yours is what is known as an Appeal to Tradition Fallacy. It is irrelevant what all "groups" of human beings have done. For one thing I am not a collection of people. I am an individual. Immigrants are not to be viewed as a GROUP. They each are individuals. So what groups have or have not done in the past is irrelevant.
That's my point exactly all groups of people have to have done that in the past. It is the nature of species.
It is still an Appeal to Tradition fallacy.
It does not prove that is RIGHT because that is what HAS been done.
If people keep repeating the same stupid thing that doesn't suddenly make it smart.
So are you saying everyone should just stay in the country that they where born in?
This conversation needs to be more logic-based as opposed to political and emotional
I just did. So obviously I CAN. You may not agree with it, but I still CAN.
If they are displaced that does not mean I should allow them into my country and then allow them to ignore the laws of my country and culture because of their culture. If we CHOOSE to give them a home then that is for them to integrate. WE/ME/YOU are not obligated to give any of THEM homes. Yet we can choose to.
Many invaders in the past invaded lands as they fled something else. If they have no intentions of integrating and becoming productive and instead demand their new home change to accommodate them then THEY (see I did it again, so I can) are invaders.
If THEY are invited (regardless of their circumstances because they are irrelevant to the term) then that makes them an immigrant. If they arrive without invitation (aka illegal) then they are invaders.
You can mince words all you want. The actions are what matters. If they do not integrate and they are allowed to RAPE because it is their culture, if we are not allowed to fly our FLAGS because it might offend them, if we tear down our churches because they are against them, but put up mosques/churches/whatever for them.... guess what??? They are invaders. Just because politicians were stupid enough to open the city gates does not change that.
There's never been an example of a refugee group entering a country and ignoring the laws as a collective. These are generally average citizens seeking a new life. An invading army is something else.
I love it when people who throw the idea at me that I should use LOGIC and not emotion are so caught up in using absolutes. You are very fond of the word ALWAYS and in this statement you said NEVER. Here is a clue. Absolutes are rarely true. It is very dangerous LOGICALLY SPEAKING to just casually throw them out there. I would assume based upon this statement you made that you consider yourself an extremely knowledgeable historical scholar who knows EVERY refugee situation in history. I mean that would need to be what you think of yourself if you can confidently throw the word NEVER out there. So since you said I should be logic I'm going to keep calling you out on it. As I will say now that your absolute there is FALSE. Nice try though.
You see the key here is that people tend to call those fleeing an invasion or bad situation REFUGEES.
The problem is if those refugees then enter a country and do not assimilate with that new country and instead take it over then they have also invaded that country.
As @everittdmickey pointed out the Koran itself has a name for invasion by immigration and it is called Hijrah.
Wave of refugees to Europe an "organised invasion" says Czech PM
Kuwaiti Invasion Refugees
Whistleblower Reveals That A UN-Planned Invasion By Refugees Into The US Is Already Underway
There is much more. That is just a bit I found by doing what YOU should do before casually saying NEVER. Yet, since you espouse logic and then use absolutes so casually I thought I'd do some work for you.
Your statements in the various responses here that used the term ALWAYS or NEVER are all false simply due to you choosing to use absolutes. If you want to say MOST or FEW which doesn't make it an absolute then they might be accurate. Yet it is you who stated logic should be used and not emotion.
Yeah kind of formulaic an predictable statement.
Ask ants about their territory. Ask dogs, cats, bears, and other animals about marking their territory.
It is part of nature.
Good on you for standing up to the wave of pc dickheads that are all over Steemit choosing to exercise their right to take offense at anything they want to be offended by!
Sounds like something someone would say who generally holds offensive views to the majority of humanity.
The reality is that many of them make bad choices in their own country, they choose politicians who promise to get their hands on the public treasury to give it away in all kinds of subsidies, and after breaking up one country they go to another, but they have not changed in absolute, and demand in a foreign country many of the same things that caused their country collapse.
It is not about racism, it is about reality, this is a fact and it does not matter where the immigrants come from, the United States lived in the past the same problems, but with the Irish and Italian immigrants, who had large numbers of their population deeply linked to the mafia.
I couldn't have put it any better myself.
Note: The Koran has a specific term for invasion by immigration.
Hijrah
Nice post beautiful presented and explained. @dwinblood thank you for share
tnx for upvote and resteem
wellcome
This is so boldly written. It's a shame how protesting against harmful practices followed by illegal immigrants have somehow become "hateful", "intolerant" and "bigoted". This world has become too politically correct for it's own good. Immigrants either adapt to the place they're going to or stay where they're from if they're so much in love with their culture.
All I can say is, thank you - to the poster and to all who commented. I did say all, for those who argued against, helped make clear just how widespread and deeply ingrained is the sick culture being taught by politicians, corporations and professors (I would even add a substantial number ofpriests).
I just hope Trump makes enough of a difference for it to wake up more people all over Europe and the UK. If they do not, then the few who believe in their own right to exist, will find themselves cornered and will have to turn vicious. That is likely to end up spreading and people will die by the millions. Even if we win, a very high price will have been paid in suffering, blood and deaths.
I have to keep dreaming, which is where I find the strength to continue trying to wake up those who are in a glazed daze, allowing the enemy to take over.
@dwinblood, are you on steemit.chat? If so, can we chat later?
I have an account on steemit.chat. I tend to avoid it and discord because my productivity goes down the tubes as soon as I start chatting. I post less, I develop less, etc. So I do have a chat, but I prefer to talk on steemit replies and comments because it is then also preserved in the blockchain and I don't personally have anything to hide. :)
Okay.