@berniesanders is bad for STEEM

in #hypocrisy7 years ago (edited)

@berniesanders posts tiny, hypocritical posts.

@berniesanders then upvotes those posts with his many accounts.

Is @berniesanders supporting self-voting whilst bitching about @haejin's self-voting?



Example; the current top trending post, and many, many others that can be found on @berniesanders' blog.


If you have not noticed, I had to take a break from this place for a few days. The ubiquitous greed is too much at times. But, after deciding to see how much shitter this place has become in my absence, I could not look at the top trending post and then simply leave. No. I could not resist the urge to highlight this hypocrisy.

Flag me if you want, @berniesanders. It will be genuinely pleasing to see your voting power getting used on someone other than yourself.

A secondary note to anyone who agrees with me but does not resteem this out of fear;

You are the fucking problem, my friends. And I do not refer solely to Steemit here. The world is this shit because you are a pussy. Perhaps if you were not, then we might have lived in a better world. Get off your knees. It's time to start acting like human beings, not dogs looking for scraps from their abusive masters.

I suppose that may sound a little harsh, but the truth far too often does.

Sort:  

Fine.. I even resteemed it... Let me see how much attention I can get, from the meaningless crowd... Who knows... I might get a positive attitude just cause I stand... Well I will stand... But that's what I do... And you all, sooner or later... Will go, with the wave... It's never really about the rewardpooll... It's about standing... I follow you both... I can't say I learn from both of you... But I could...
Ohhh.. from what it looks like even SBD could be bad for Steem...
But... Both of you have no idea about the platform... You are both wrong... Thanks to @mejustandrew ...I got to read the blue paper... from this post: https://steemit.com/steem/@mejustandrew/flash-post-from-steem-bluepaper-what-is-valuable-content. And it makes me feel everyone is wrong... Including you both... None of you have more rights then I do... but I got none... So do you!!! The rest is just drama...
By the way.. I fully believe the a Self-Upvote option should not even exist... only an American can think of that... We all Special... few years from now everyone will use it... It has benefits to be stupid... Oh... I mean Special... WTF.. I'll vote myself...meaningless.. But wanna feel Special..

I tried multiple times but I'm unable to make much sense of this.

Thats shitty your getting flagged.
he killed my account a bunch of times, no one gave a shit.
00000000000000000 copy

He had me at -9 once even. only advice i can give and im sure you dont want to hear it is to try to go back to posting how you use to before the whole ordeal with him and hopefully he will leave you alone.

I wish i had an easy solution to the problem but i dont yet. just give it some time........

Hurrah

You're back

Was beginning to wonder where you went to

resteemed

I often disappear for a little while here and there, but purpose draws me back. Glad to see you have some balls.

As I have asked elsewhere in this fight:

  1. Is there a limit to how much a single Steemian can earn on STEEMit?
  2. Why won't the Powers That Be, simply add a couple of security features that would eliminate 99% of bot voting?

If the person isn't using bots and is still getting rewards because they bought into the system and hold Steem Power, why do we care? The upvote bots, one of which Bernie owns, constantly push STEEM/SBD into the exchanges and possibly are part of the price pump and dumping that has been going on since last fall.

I think you overestimate how much power berniesanders has. He may be a whale here on Steemit, but he has not got the funds to influence the market to any substantial degree. The markets are quite clearly controlled by a network of bots which have unlimited funds. Bernie could dump everything he has and the market would recover almost immediately. You give the man boy far too much credit.

I didn't vote for him!

Why not? Ur still a chicken...

Because he is a socialist

Well @Haejin does this 10 times a day for many months. @Berniesanders was fighting that for months wasting his SP.

Do I agree with him getting that reward? I do, because otherwise he could join the other side and do what Haejin does and we could have two donkeys by now.

Just compare the vote distribution of @haejin , @ranchorelaxo and @berniesanders

It's not the same case.

I'm aware of all of this... and still believe it will fix nothing!... It's not even supposed too... Read the Blue Paper!!

Please backup your arguments. I don't have time for the blue paper

Then backup ur issues... It will save you a lifetime..

Then you will stand wrong!
That's how it goes... No one has time to figure the real issues/solutions...they should expect Juses/Hitlery to fix it... And it won't get fix, because it's not their ground/field... It's us! They can't help it even if they tried...ohhh, I forgot... They don't even exist, except on some ppls minds...my bad!

The blue paper is only 7 pages I can read it in 10 minutes. If you keep providing generic arguments without substance I will have nothing to argue with.

You said it will fix nothing: are you talking about flagging or reporting abusers? Because both work pretty well and save our precious reward pool

"No one has time to figure the real issues/solutions": do you mind sharing us your insights since you did spend the time. If you're alluding to the whole steem system, then I can agree its not perfect but how is doing nothing better than what berniesanders do?!

Simple.... From the Blue paper, for Dummies!
Rewards for Content Creators and Curators
The exact definition of what Steemit Inc. finds as being valuable content:

The users who produce content are adding value to the network by creating material that will drive new users to the platform, as well as keep the existing users engaged and entertained.

This is to me very clear, valuable content, or content that is adding value to the network is meeting one of those or both criteria:

It is material that will drive new users to the platform.

It is material that will keep the existing users engaged and entertained.

You didn't bring anything new by reading your blue paper. That is the reason why we flag, we disagree on what brings users to the platform and keep them engaged. So far only @ranchorelaxo finds value in @haejin content and that's why he is always on trending. There are countless number of TAs who are better/or same that don't get this reward.

What you think is driving users to the platform I think is actually destroying the platform. If his content is really worth it to be trending. Then let his whale friend stop pumping him and we can see how many users think he's bring anything to the platform.

He doesn't engage with anyone but himself. Look at this circle jerk.

Well @Haejin does this 10 times a day for many months. @Berniesanders was fighting that for months wasting his SP.

Bernie has raped the reward pool for far longer, with multiple accounts, and through deceptive means. For, as much as he can't resist the urge to abuse his power, he for some reason likes to appear as the good guy. I'd much prefer an honest villain to one who masquerades as a hero.

Do I agree with him getting that reward? I do, because otherwise he could join the other side and do what Haejin does and we could have two donkeys by now.

Do you really believe this nonsense, mate? I hope so, because the other alternative is that you are hoping berniesanders will read this and upvote you, and I care not for that sort of arselickery on my posts. Anyone who sells votes is not on your side. They get curation rewards for voting fairly, but they don't vote fairly. They sell you what was always yours to begin with, and then act like they have done something honourable. Meanwhile, they are accumulating more and more power over the network when their task was to help distribute the wealth, not horde it.

If you are going to compare vote distributions then you will first have to uncover all of his accounts, which won't be easy, because he has a fucking lot of them.

he does vote for himself. bernie owns like 10 accounts that constantly upvote everything he posts. hes a hypocrite to the nth degree.

I agree and the best thing about is that he's also stiffling an open debate about it. Even if your criticism is constructive, he's hammering it with flags. Here, my 2 cents: steemit .com /rewardpoolrape/ @doodlebear/the-real-reward-pool-rapists-are-not-haejin-and-sweetsssj-but-nextgencrypto-and-his-likes

Highly rEsteemed because!

And because a few idiots think I'm bernie...

And because you happen to be correct on you observations.

And you were missed ; )

Screen Shot 2018-03-18 at 9.59.00 PM.png

He was most definitely missed.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 62014.91
ETH 2410.27
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50