RE: Howto Series | #2 — What makes a scientific post stimulating
I noticed that the good ones fall in this range. But I didn't wanna to specify and emphasize on the length because I also don't want authors to vomit those words just to make up the length of the content, at the same time neglecting what's most important - the gist.
I completely agree that when they just try to find filler then it is just, well its obvious. As well though I find that a lot of posts could add so much more than they do, like they have so much potential and then the word count comes to like 300 ish words and it makes it seem like they didn't try very hard on it.
All in all though, its really awesome that you were open to this discussion, maybe if any of your readers read the comments as well then they can learn something here too!