You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: #sv-psicologia // Mi corazon azul 2 de Abril dia Mundial de la concientización sobre el Autismo
I like your post a lot. Unfortunately, it does not meet the requirements for an sc vote. Please only use the tag #club5050 if you regularly power up 50% of your rewards.
http://steemit.lovestoblog.com/clubstatus.php?author=edittacar86
Greetings @steemcurator08 ... I'm glad you liked my post... but I don't understand I'm currently in the ·# club5050
With this tool I can indicate my last power on:
I also used this tool to check my status of withdrawals and activations during the last month
According to this information, today I am still part of the #club5050, I appreciate if you can clarify this situation for me..
Good day ..
Our team has chosen to use a tool which takes more information into account which we believe to be more in keeping with the spirit of clubs so until you decide what to do with the over 80 STEEM in your wallet, we don't consider you to be eligible for a steemcurator08 upvote.
Greetings friend @the-gorilla. I think that this new criterion must be approved by the Steemit team before being applied.
CC @steemcurator01 @edittacar86
I've added more detail in a post I made today outlining the rationale to our approach - https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@the-gorilla/my-view-on-club5050-eligibility
We outlined our approach to clubs in our application and hope that we can encourage people to power up more of the STEEM sitting in their wallet.
I understand that you have an approach on this topic, I even respect it, but as long as it is not approved by the Steemit team, it is not correct to apply it.
But it has already been confirmed.
We - and especially we committed users - know that we have to gather information from comments. And it is our "duty" to pass this on to others so that they do not fall into the "trap".
It's always easier to take aim at comments that don't suit an individual and then make a lot of hot air about them.
We have acted with good intentions: Help users who don't know correctly, in the spirit of community (nothing else is a (club) powerup), to do everything right. All the fuss is now leading us, as sc08, to stop writing comments and simply not vote. That's not nice either, is it?
Greetings friend chriddi
It is important that you know that I am not against their actions, but the way they do it, for me it is not convenient to write as a comment "I like your post but you do not deserve the vote" without leaving a reason in that same comment, I think it was more convenient to write that according to the new tool, the user did not comply with the #club5050 as it presents a liquid balance of Steem.
It should be noted that this is not new to me, as I am always pending "as far as possible" to be a guarantor that users comply with the policies implemented through @steemitblog. I can show you this case in which I informed my friend messilevi that she had not activated enough Steem with respect to the available Steem to consider her in the #club100.
https://steemit.com/hive-193637/@messilevi/09-03-2022-club5050-the-diary-game-dormi-a-ana-por-messilevi
I have nothing to fear, I learned from the beginning that the important thing is to keep increasing my Steem Power, my desires to grow outweigh any need I may have at the moment, as I told you, I was just struck by the way they applied this rule that "later" was explained. I never said I was against it, I just said it should be accepted by @steemcurator01.
I have shown my admiration for @the-gorilla application, in fact, I have worked with him on some issues and we share activities in World Of Xpilar, my message is just for clarification.
To close, I invite you to be motivators, we know that there are cheaters, I know because I do life in the newcomers community where they have been creating farming accounts, but this type of accounts that already have 870 SP, I do not think it will be cheating with 6 SBD.
It is beautiful to serve the community and the platform, let's do it in the best way.
Hello dear Adeljose,
I know who you are and all you do for the Steem. That's great! Believe me, I can appreciate it very well, because the Steem has been my virtual home for over four years. Since then, I have been committed to "fighting" to keep it a home to feel good in. Various users with completely wrong ideas often make life difficult at home - you know that, I know that.
I honour your engagement and have never attacked you, so you don't have to justify anything to me.
The reason for the reason was the link to the calculation of the PowerUp volume. I must assume that adult users can read this. Or they ask if they are unsure (which has happened). Communication is everything - this took place after the question. Making the factual discussion what it has now become (and I'm not talking about me, I'm talking about the attacks on @the-gorilla as the developer of the tool as well as the howling for sc01) is down to bystanders, not the user who asked.
No one was talking about cheating. Certainly not! We just wanted to help understanding the club status.
We'll stop with that now. It's also pointless: as long as the majority of users don't understand that they don't power up to please sc or booming, but to support the community - and thus themselves - every measure remains a fight against windmills... 😞
We've assumed implicit approval for being selected as a team. But I understand the point and we don't need to tell people "this is what you could have won".
@steemcurator01 o @steemcurator02, si no dan su opinion al respecto, seguiran pasando estas cosas, y mas usuarios quedaran sin apoyo por un uso malintencionado de los datos.
Como parte de la administracion de los recursos de Steemit, deben dar su opinion para que todos manejen un mismo lenguaje a la hora de hacer cumplir las reglas sobre los clubes. ASi todos los usuarios se preparan para siempre estar dentro de las normas.
Obviamente, la mayoria no concuerda con este criterio. Asi que, en nombre de la comunidad venezolana te pedimos que opines.
In addition to my other reply...
Whilst I wasn't the one who wrote the steemcurator08 comment, I've chosen to be the one to defend it.
There is no malice in encouraging users to power up.
However, there appears to be plenty of malice in your attempts to discredit a tool which displays more information than other tools - understandably so as it showed your 2800 STEEM that you had trading in the market that you didn't want to power up for a reason that you and I are both aware of and that I know you will share in due course.
Perhaps this user is waiting for May so that they can take part in #spud4steem? After choosing not to take part in April's.
So no, there's no "malicious use of data". If there was malice here, you'll be the first to know about it.
Don't forget that I also recommended you to put the balance sheet, operations in the internal market, it would still be good to include savings, savings transfers. I even made you see what was going on with fill_vesting.
I am not trying to harm the tool, I support it, you know I do, it's even great because you can see everything. But the way they interpreted the data to evaluate this publication and the user's club status is an example of misuse, and that's what we were afraid of.
Let's talk about the user, this user in the last month earned only 8,013 SBD Liquids, according to steemworld (April 05 to March 05).
But she invested in Power UP = 54.120 STEEM, for me and for everyone she is in the club5050, she is even fulfilling the club's goal which is to invest in SP more than 50% of her earnings.
In addition, the Power UP is greater than the withdrawals during the same period.
The balance that you have in favor, at some point you will have to withdraw it and you will have to turn on the corresponding %, or maybe you are saving it to participate and / or win the May in the SPUD.
For the majority of users who are not in a club100, this user complies with the rules.
After a day of dealing with this, and just stop supporting users for that very reason, then you're going to tell me that there is no bad intention, when there is.
Forgive me for not replying to you again. I have an evil agenda to fulfil and you're inhibiting its progress.
Actually, MOST do. YOU do not.
https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@steemcurator01/r9uhyg
No importa lo que digas, las reglas son claras y deben respetarse.
And despite their clarity, you are still choosing to ignore...
https://steemit.com/hive-185836/@steemcurator01/r9uhyg
Which is very clear and as you say, must be followed.
I understand what they said in the comment. But it is a comment on data that they use and are based on when choosing who to give their rewards to.
As long as @steemitblog does not officially pronounce for a rule change that:
No other interpretation should be taken into account to choose the booming or to use the SC04-SC04 accounts.
We are only trying to support the users, so that all are evaluated in the same way. For example, if from today we have to see things in this way, we will apply a change, but just inform us about it. But you tell me, what is your role, do you really care about the users, do you care about the steem community in general, or do you only care about your own profit?
I don't think you realise how rude you are. It's quite astonishing really how devoid of emotional intelligence you are.
Good luck reaching your May objective before you power down. I know I've said this once, but this really is the last reply you'll get.
Sometimes, things are not as they seem, sometimes you have to do or say things to see who can be trusted.
I am sorry, it is not my intention that you feel offended, although I have also felt offended. I hope you can see things as a common user.