You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Our Thoughts : Supporting 20+ Witness @justinsunsteemit : HIVE Punishment
To be honest, it was just a reaction against people spamming me to vote for wittnesses non stop. I had no Idea what was going on at the time, I just got triggered upon oblivion from messages while I was trying to get work done.
As I understand there will be some sort of proposal system for excluded account to explain themselves. Let's be mature about the matter and build bridges rather than blowing them up :)
@foreveraverage thanks, i think you are very clear, innocent and intelligent. As my past experience with some witnesses, they don't here the my voice. They mentally prepare to not change the decision for me. They also want centralized system but talking for decentralized. Why they started witnesses vote after 30 day HIVE powerup? Think over it. Why they don't remove 30 witness votes from one account. This is all because their own centralization, which they call decentralized.
Thank you very much for your kind words, though my better half might disagree on the intelligent part ;). While some witnesses might be hard to communicate I honestly think it doesn't apply for the majority of them. In addition to that it must be hard to make decisions like these considering all the "background noise".
Now I don't think those that had way more knowledge about the whole matter and voted against the witnesses or stalemated the situation should be punished for having their own opinion, as long as it all remain civilized. Progress has never been made by everyone always agreeing on the same things.
That being said, however, it is maybe justified for the Hive community to want some clarification on the matter before letting the accounts that voted for those witnesses enjoy the same privileges as they do on Steem