RE: Something Useful For Blockchain
Thank you for all the comments and answers you have given. This is very valuable to the community.
I'm sure the load on SC01 and SC02 is too much. It would be nice if there were other great manual curators. I've already thought about it. One of the ways is to involve delegations. I could create a manual curator like @blogger-helper. But for this, the project must be competitive with UPVU. Currently, UPVU investors who publish one post daily receive approximately 5.3 (SP+STEEM) per 1000 SP delegated per week. So, in order for @blogger-helper to be able to compete with UPVU, it should offer its investors approximately the same profit.
One way to achieve this, I considered, would be to post daily with the @blogger-helper account, and use the profits from those posts to pay out investors. However, my calculations show that this scheme works if there are 10-15 investors. If there are many more of them, then it is impossible to ensure such a level of profitability. Some more ways are needed.
But it is certain that such a manual curator would be completely independent from the Steemit team, and only a few of the most authoritative users would have access to it for curation.
In short, I have more to think about.
I am not convinced that a new vote account or bot will help us....
Unless it works like penny4thoughts, who follows one or more other users. But in the end, any system, no matter how sophisticated, will probably be exploited at some point.
I agree. But a few extra powerful manual curators wouldn't hurt. This would make the system more decentralized and show people that you can earn real money for good quality and interesting posts. Quality can be bought. At the end of the day, most people on Steemit are just out to make money and it would be better if they did it by creating quality content.
It's right. Fortunately, the SC has announced that it will examine the posts closely. This and the increased amounts going to @null and being burnt are certainly good for the Steem. :-)