A small hint for curators

New teams of curators have recently started work. All of them have published their guidelines and among the rules we can see the following:

In general, the requirement to have at least 300 words in the post is fair, because we want those who put more effort to convey something to the readers to receive more rewards. But I got the impression that sometimes the curators treat this rule too carefully. Namely, when it comes to art.

If an artist wants to show off a painting he's been creating for a month, does he have to write something in 300 words? And if he wants us to see in the picture what only we can see there?

The same goes for professional fine art photography. Often such photos speak for themselves.

However, in my opinion, art is undervalued in Steemit, and I'll give you an example.

I have shown you three professional artists who follow the club system. Most of her posts are rewarded around $2. This support has a single source - @xpilar's curation trail. Those posts that received more rewards were nominated by moderators on booming. Among these posts, I did not come across a single one that was supported by the team of curators.

Why? Creating a picture requires no less effort than writing 300 words. The same goes for creating a good photo. You can take 1000 pictures, and only one of them can be considered true art.

With this post, I want to urge curatorial teams to pay more attention to art as well. And, taking this opportunity, I want to show you this comment from SC01:

I also appeal to artists, join the club system and #burnsteem25 initiative and you will be able to get more support.