You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Ideas about Anti-abuse alert. Power Up #lub100
You are absolutely right. The automatic analysis of posts is very difficult. Even manual analysis is not absolutely reliable, unless you find the original. We have often read in your posts how difficult it is to check.
For me, automatic analysis is more experimental. I have only skimmed the code so far, but from my point of view it cannot be done with a few lines. This is more a field of artificial intelligence...
Besides, the automatic comments are rather unsuitable for the acceptance of the experiment. This should run more in the background.
Thank you @moecki for your feedback and glad to have your opinion here. I believe it is very sensitive area when such automatic mechanism in detecting abuse is running and especially if it is running without and published under the post but then checked after publishing that is something that will make many people angry, like it was with me.Abuse check and double check should be done in background but when the evidence found then it should be presented because then as one old quote says: "Not caught, not a thief" Appreciate for taking your time and for your opinion.