RE: We welcome you all to this week's edition of #talkchannel in the WORLD OF THE XPILAR COMMUNITY, this week's theme: ***ABUSE AND PLAGIARY CONSIDERATIONS***( week 38) by @adeljose
Hello @adeljose
This particular issue, I can say for a start, is something that consumes fighting plagiarism, literally.
Going through different plagiarism detectors, makes reading a publication take you up to 20+ minutes. Even if it is short.
The reason is that there are many who want to take advantage of what is not theirs, either out of ignorance or simply because they are tempted to do so.
We have seen totally absurd answers when you ask yourself why its content is identical to this other one?
I particularly made a publication some time ago to guide the newest ones on how to properly cite sources of quotations, images, etc. I use it when I first get a plagiarism in some new user. If you keep doing it, that's already a major abuse.
However, there are things that are about to be written into the *"rules" aspect of this, to call them by some sort of name. And every day brings something new. Example:
There is a user who has an account on Blutr and publishes those posts on steemit. He claims that they are his posts, from his accounts. Because they are 4 different blutr accounts with different name than the one he has in steemit, that is very rare. You have to find a way to confirm that it's really the same user. And so every day new things come up.
But for me there is something basic, if it's not yours, don't present it as yours. Otherwise it is a fault, and as such it must be assumed.
Thank you for bringing this topic up for discussion.
Thanks @crypto.piotr for the mention.
Greetings friend @josevas217.
I know and follow your good works, it's very true your opinion about how annoying it can be to verify the authenticity of a content, but sometimes it's obviously necessary to apply the corrections. We in World of Xpilar have found in several occasions publications that just by looking at them, already generate uncertainty about the ownership of information. Images with logos and names stamped different from the user's name is a clear sign of plagiarism.
Moving forward in the conservatory, one of the problems brought about by Steemit's bifurcation is this, not because of the duplication of content, but because of the duplication of identity "new users" generated to steal information and take it to another platform, such is the case of @fundacorazon, who despite not having generated a user in Hive, there was an account with the same name using the same content in that platform.
To conclude, I sincerely thank you for the time you have taken to interact with us on this subject, I hope you continue to give the platform its great work.
Greetings.
Brilliant comment @josevas217
Thx for sharing your thoughts