Surprisingly, sc02 voted on one such comment and I wonder if they agree with all the points

At the time, the sc01 laughingly agreed with me.
I think "the team" knows exactly who they are dealing with and when, and they agree with the idea as a very good one. However, they are probably a little afraid of the consequences: Everything would be different and they would have to do their part to steer the "different" in the desired direction. Besides there are the cr for the team that are the only (visible) income of the big stake. No matter who they vote after discontinuing the initiatives, there will always be grumbling. They have done a relatively good job of averting that in recent months/years. Who wants to knowingly indulge in the guaranteed repetition of this silly begging?