Steemit Engagement Challenge / S16/W6 - "What happens if motor vehicles are banned around the world?

Special greetings my friends! Starting this week with my entry for the Steemit Engagement Challenge Season 16 Week 6, in the Hindwhale Community. I will like to invite @pandora2010, @saintkelvin17, @bossj23, @patjewell and @josepha to come partake in this contest.

Motor vehicles have been very helpful for a very long time now, and has made living and traveling easier. If these machines are banned around the world, there will be a variety of opinion relative to the advantages and disadvantages that comes with it. I'd simply speak with respect to the pros a cons of not having motor vehicles operate around the world.

Decrease in Pollution:

Vehicles emit smoke which contains harmful gases into the environment, and harms the earth. It also depletes the ozone layer which paves way for harmful radiations to pass through and heat the earth

Decrease in Natural Disasters:

Natural disasters like flood, tsunami, and fires all occur as a result of global warming. Over heating due to deletion of the ozone layer also can easily result to enormous fires in forests during a thunderstorm. And the rapid melting of Ice mountains have led to increasing flood and tsunami. Rapid earthquakes are far from absent.
Restrictions on vehicle circulation around the world will decrease such natural disasters from frequently occuring by reducing the oscillation time.

Decrease in diseases:

The most common diseases that comes from floods, overheating, and earthquakes are malaria, typhoid, stroke, heart attack, and so much more. As such, stopping vehicles from moving around is will result to a drop in all this events that give rise to these sicknesses.

Available of Energy (fossil fuels):

Vehicles use up large amounts of fossil fuel which is non-renewable. It takes so many years for this form of energy to be formed, yet machines use it up rapidly in very few years.

There are just a few disadvantages, but these points are quite significant to humans in our day to day activities.

Saves Time:

It saves a lot of time for us when we use vehicles to go to different locations. Vehicles move at very high speed that saves us over a quarter of our life's which could have been spent in walking. A ban on vehicles around the world will lead to us spending more time trekking to our distant venues, than we have to actually carry our the activities that took us there to begin with.

Saves energy / Ease work:

It gives us more time to do more in a day, and relieves some stress which could be incurred from walking. This serves us so much energy that could be redirected into some other important activity. Placing a ban on vehicles around the world will cause us to stress more and even do less in a day. Some vehicles lift heavy cargos for us, which saves us energy and eases work.

This question is funny because I was already thinking about that, I guess you too did same already. My answer is YES, a big "yes" because truth be told, humans can't execute all activities on time without a helping hand. Even those humans that choose to lend a helping hand to others will need help if distance is to be covered.
We will most definitely go some centuries back to emulate what the travelers did and how they did it. Some animals like Camels, horses, elephants and donkeys will become our traveling helpers. It won't be as fast as the vehicles we now use, but it would be much better compared to walking those distances with cargos on our heads and backs.

It will not be all bad actually, I think this is the only question I can respond to, without actually going against the ban of vehicles. We could think of machines in general as great enemies to the environment, as they keep taking, polluting and sucking it dry without any significant returns to it. Yes! We benefit from vehicles, but what benefits do the environment get??? There would be more tranquility in the environment than this generation has ever witnessed. Urban area with no cars have clean air to breathe and calm space to think, the crops bear excellently, and the waters are much cleaner and safe to drink and inhabit.

This question is tricky I must say. Humans are the most curious and determined creatures that walk this mother earth, there is absolutely no way they won't think of something that moves exactly love vehicles. They may give the invention a different name, but it will have the features of a vehicle. Having said that, now if I was to assume that by some means, it was never invented, I think flying cars would be a rush invention, or shoes that run as cars do. Or better still, bikes with so much upgrades, or ships that run on land. We will invent something that functions like vehicles in a ways no matter the turn of events.

All that I have said in this entry is based on my knowledge, and the way I see and understand this topic and relate to it on a personal level. In short, this is my view on this matter of discussion. The world would be much better than worse, if vehicles were to be banned around the world. Lives will be extended, the reoccurrence of natural disasters will decrease, and above all there will be a planet to leave behind for future generations to inhabit.