You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Perhaps anarchy already exists and "THE COMMUNITY" is merely the highest manifestation of organized crime.
I'm developing this idea under the working title, Government As Referee Framework (GARF).
That phase gave me goosebumps.
You have my full attention, it is something that I have thought of many times during my time here and you have my full support. When will you be posting?
I'm still gathering data.
How would you describe your "Ideal Referee Government"?
Don't think too hard, just a "rough sketch", a "working theory" or "interim hypothesis" is all I'm looking for.
What do you think most people consider the "primary use case" for Government?
This post by @valued-customer may be of interest in that regard.
https://peakd.com/news/@valued-customer/censoring-hive-it-s-happening-right-now
To my way of think the first thing to do is articulate what real problems the platform faces, such as:
Plagiarism
Flagging for differences of opinion
Spam
phishing
Multiple accounts used for self voting. I know this happens but does it really cause harm to the platform?
Blatant dishonesty and making false claims against people. I have seen a lot of this against many people.
Censorship/denial of access to services for certain accounts. I am unable to vote, comment or access my wallet with the hive front end after a comment I made on Steemchillers post. I am sure people suffer that kind of abuse here
I am in favor of having a completely transparent system where any action taken against an account is clearly stated and can be clearly seen as justifiable.
I would also prefer a system with no flags and problems dealt with at the code level. That would require achieving community consensus on what is and what is not acceptable on the platform, and should also still require human action to enact any action against an account
I would be against policing things like low effort posts
And NEVER targeting specific accounts.
One LAW for everyone. 100% enforcement.