club100 | "Object of the Week" #24- sea shell
В рамках конкурса: https://steemit.com/hive-171319/@strecoza/contest-object-of-the-week-24-sea-shell-obekt-nedeli-24-morskie-rakushki
Вот с зонтиками я не дружу. Никак. А ракушек пару штук у меня завалялось.
Вот первый "набор". Купили его ещё во времена моего детства: семьёй ездили на Азовское море, в Бердянск (в 1984 и 1988 годах. С тех пор я на море и не был никогда), там и купили, только я не помню, в первую, или во вторую поездку. Вроде, во вторую. Знал бы азовский моллюск, что ЭТО будет пылиться в шкафу в окружении посуды 40 с лишним лет...
Знал бы продавец, который её продал, что она переживёт его! (почти наверняка пережила).
Шкаф, кстати, старше этих ракушек. Ещё 10 лет он, может, и переживёт, если его не трогать. 20 лет - наврятли.
Лот Номер 2 - шкатулка. Привезла её откуда-то с морей моя сестра. Без понятия, откуда. Без понятия, из чего она сделана, и сколько стоила.
Лот Номер 3. Гигантская ракушка. С пятилитровое ведро, наверное. И весит килограмма 2-2.5. Тоже не знаю, откуда она появилась. Улитка, жившая в ней, наверное, могла бы пережить ядерный взрыв (вместе с тараканами). Иногда меня терзают смутные сомнения, что это всё же керамика. Но - наружная поверхность - шероховатая, а внутренняя - гладенькая.
Ну и Лот №4, раковины обыкновенные, самые заурядные:
If you reduce the amount you vote your own posts, we can start to vote for you.
63% self-voting is too high!
Thanks for your input, @steemcurator01. I will tell to the other Steemians. And my voting CSI is 0 % for my self, 198 upvotes for 140 account. I would like to ask the Steemit team, are there any special provisions for voting? I think there are still many steemians who don't know it yet.
😊😊😊
I think this is interesting to discuss, but some time ago it was mentioned that ideally not to vote for yourself more than 10%.
It is better to use the upvote for members in the community or outside the community.
But the regulation on this matter is not explained in the specific content.
It also looks bad that some community administrators use the community account to vote for themselves, instead of giving votes to more members of the community.
If this is how they behave with one account "orca", I do not want to imagine if it would have millions of SP.
Thank you for pointing this out. I think this issue was needed to be pointed out. Community admins and mods voting regularly on their own posts. Where this community curator initiative is a very good one for true decentralization, I really hope the team members don't practice self voting with the steemcurator accounts as well. Let's see what happens
Thank you, steemcurator, I will reduce it
Hi Mr @steemcurator01. I'm still new to the use of curation. Is there a curation limit.
I am one of the Mod community. Is there a concept of using correct curation, So that I can do justice to the users of my community page. Although my strength is not great, But at least I can appreciate them.
Se debe masificar los votos, están escasos y siempre a los mismos usuarios.
Desconocía que se podía votar por uno mismo al un porcentaje menor, siempre pensé que era prohibido hacer esa practica.
También he podido notar usuarios con reciclaje de imágenes que han sido votados y pensaba que eso también estaba prohibido, las reglas deben cumplirse para todos, sino estamos en un ecosistema injusto que pronto caerá por su propio peso.
Votes should be massified, they are scarce and always to the same users.
I did not know that you could vote for yourself at a lower percentage, I always thought that it was forbidden to do that practice.
I have also been able to notice users with recycling of images that have been voted and I thought that this was also prohibited, the rules must be followed for everyone, otherwise we are in an unfair ecosystem that will soon fall under its own weight.
It is better not to vote for yourself at all. Use your votes on other members of the community.
Do you have any examples of this...
Yes of course, I agree, I have never voted for myself.
I have seen it, but it is not my responsibility to have the evidence to show it. Nor would he be willing to show them and then have someone as an enemy, since he is a user, so to speak, of his list that votes constantly.
Yeah you are right sir,
We must stop self voting, i even just created a post to enlighten more users on self voting and it's effect.
Publications like this are missing, teaching what should not be done, it is the clearest way to educate.
I read this comment, I just found out that using votes for the community is very much better, thank you steemcurator01 I already understand the voting problem
Hi :
After the wallet activity plugin "The Best club5050& club75&club100 SteemFoods Posts of the Day" in the SteemFoods Community, I added the Voting CSI table plugin.
In this way, you will now be able to see the Voting CSI table of the users I selected in detail. With this improvement, I'm sure our users in the community will minimize their self-vote amount. For details, you can visit our announcement below.
Voting CSI Chart Integrating into The Best #club5050 - #club75 - #club100 SteemFoods Posts Of The Day... 🆕 ⭐️
I have added 5 of our users who have a self-vote amount of 0 in Voting CSI and use their voting power successfully, to The Best club5050-club75-club100 SteemFoods Posts" on 08-02-2022. In addition, many of our users I selected on 08-02-2022 are members of club75 and club100. I would be very happy if you check these posts when you are available and have a chance to vote... :)
08-02-2022|The Best #club5050& #club75 & #club100 SteemFoods Posts Of The Day 🆕 | Voting CSI Table Plugin ✅
I hope this development will be useful...
Best Regards... @steemcurator01 🙂
Sorry about the intrusion into other user's comments. Sir @steemcurator01, I'm have a question with my mind for a while. I've already joined a community curation trail. So that got my vote for my articles by that curation trail. Therefore, my self vote percentage is 1.1%. But I do not want to get self votes for my articles. I would like to know what you think about this.
It would be better, if we don't choose posts ourselves, and all the power we have can help new users. that's what we do at STEEM FOR BETTER LIFE
Yeah you are right,
That what every community should do.
#club75
Then what about us who have delegated half of our Steem power? We give 100% vote to community members, and is it useful?
Sometimes my account's bandwidth drops below 50% and if it's 100% full it's likely to only be able to provide 0.1 per curation. Do you still have to provide regular voting support every day, please give your feedback, sir.
Ideally keep your voting power in the range 80% - 100%, but don't let it remain at 100% otherwise your votes are wasted.
Sir i have a question?
I noticed that if an author joins a curation trail and the curation trail is used to vote the author, that author automatically votes his or her self. In that condition will that author be guilty of self voting or not.
The curation trail is not the right thing to do, because it is not objective. I see the Upvote manual is better to use so knowing which posts are curated and the percentage will be more selective. This is just my opinion
Ok dear friend for enlightening me on this.
Alright, we got it, thanks for the advice and motivation.
So far I have joined the PromoSteem community as a Moderator and Business Promoters, I am actively promoting with promoters in Indonesia.
So, I will realize the Vote program to support the participants of the PromoSteem Learn With Steem activities every day. And I will keep the bandwidth above 80% and not wasted at 100%. Thank you, Best Regard - Bangmimi
...А нафлудили-тааа... нафлудили... =)
лот №3 - натуральная, точно не керамика
Спасибо за участие!