"We offer support without club content, but we opted not to mention it initially to prevent potential misuse. Maintaining a club is essential for the platform's growth. Rest assured, we will include details in our first-week report. You can trust us as we have connections with talented writers and dedicated Steemians working for noble causes."
I am not sure why you felt offended. I was not pointing any fingers or challenging your credibility as a curator or a seasoned Steemian.
I was just sharing my humble experience.
before you nominate someone like @dipi2024, it's essential to ensure that your homework is up to par.
Ok! Noted :)
And I never said that I didn't or can't make any mistakes. We are all human beings at the end of the day honey.
I've had to remove my votes once or twice upon realizing some errors. Thanks a lot for highlighting the user and the issue.
Members from 2017 to 2020 contributed to this team, each with their own valuable experiences
Agreed sweety
Erm, I’m still not sure why you got so angry though. I thought we were all about sharing our experiences. I was definitely not trying to be critical here.
Ciertamente, hay algunos usuarios que por diferentes causas en este momento no se encuentran en el club, sin embargo, algunas publicaciones son simplemente excelentes, por lo que se pudieran apoyar.
También he visto otros escenarios en los que cuando reciben el voto de apoyo se encuentran en un club, pero pasados 1, 2 o 3 días, por alguna razón salen de club.
No queremos normatizarlo porque la idea es que todos estemos en los clubes, pero no nos cerramos a esa posibilidad.
"We offer support without club content, but we opted not to mention it initially to prevent potential misuse. Maintaining a club is essential for the platform's growth. Rest assured, we will include details in our first-week report. You can trust us as we have connections with talented writers and dedicated Steemians working for noble causes."
But your curation guidelines say otherwise. It maybe confusing for some authors.
The content should always take precedence, but there can be different scenarios:
Content, club, voting CSI: ✅✅✅
Content, club, voting CSI: ✅❌✅
Content, club, voting CSI: ✅❌❌
Content, club, voting CSI: ❌✅✅
And such...
I think sc01 meant, you can vote outside of the clubs, but can still weigh the post accordingly!
That's just my humble opinion after my experience of curation...
@soulfuldreamer
Thank you for your suggestions
Hi @sduttaskitchen
I am not sure why you felt offended. I was not pointing any fingers or challenging your credibility as a curator or a seasoned Steemian.
I was just sharing my humble experience.
Ok! Noted :)
And I never said that I didn't or can't make any mistakes. We are all human beings at the end of the day honey.
I've had to remove my votes once or twice upon realizing some errors. Thanks a lot for highlighting the user and the issue.
Agreed sweety
Erm, I’m still not sure why you got so angry though. I thought we were all about sharing our experiences. I was definitely not trying to be critical here.
Peace and blessings!
Thanks for your understanding
Ciertamente, hay algunos usuarios que por diferentes causas en este momento no se encuentran en el club, sin embargo, algunas publicaciones son simplemente excelentes, por lo que se pudieran apoyar.
También he visto otros escenarios en los que cuando reciben el voto de apoyo se encuentran en un club, pero pasados 1, 2 o 3 días, por alguna razón salen de club.
No queremos normatizarlo porque la idea es que todos estemos en los clubes, pero no nos cerramos a esa posibilidad.
Gracias por su comentario.
Saludos
This is the best thing after sliced bread!
0.00 SBD,
0.02 STEEM,
0.02 SP,
0.00 TRX
Totally agreed with you as there are many good content creators whose posts are outstanding outside the clubs too.