You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curation Report, Team #4 / Week #4. October
Greetings friend @inspiracion.
We CRs, we are above any other user, since we must share quality content like others, therefore, we are in the same right to be postulated to a Top5 "if the publication has the proper quality", in this sense I respect the observation of the friend @deepak98.
I appreciate your visit and consideration.
Yes, but here exchanges between the same users are observed, which is not correct.
It is true that a Cr can be postulated. But there are exchanges between votes of team members, that's what I want to highlight.
I'm not going to get to the point of pointing fingers, but I invite you to review the team reports. Coincidences don't happen twice.
Greetings and thanks for the feedback.
Note: I mean the different teams, not just this one.
I understand
That is correct, and I myself have commented on it in the report of your team.
I like to be correct in my management, and therefore, I have indicated in bold letters the observation where this case of selecting the same author is fulfilled.