You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 탈출

in zzan5 years ago (edited)

네가 문학을 아니?
네가 그림을 아니?
네가 예술을 아니?
더군다나 네가 한국어를 아니?
어떻게 내가 쓴 글의 의미를 알고 네가 평가를 하니?

너는 피카소의 그림도 왜 비싸냐고 할 인물이고
괴테가 지은 책,파우스트도 저울에 달아서 종이 값이면 된다고 할 사람이다.

난 너를 이해하려고 노력했고
너를 설득하려 수많은 시도를 했고
사정도 했고 설명도 했고
그 많은 다운 보팅을 너와 너의 친구들로부터 당하면서도 참고 참고 참았다.

너의 본성은 착하리라 기대 했으나 이제는 그런 기대도 없다.
너는 스팀의 가치를 갉아먹는 송충이고 나는 스팀을 살찌우고 여러 사람을 돕는 누에이다.

송충이는 솔잎을 갉아먹고 소나무까지 죽이는 피해만 주지만 누에는 뽕을 많이 먹을수록 많은 사람들에게 유익한 비단을 더많이 뽑을수있는 누에고치를 크고 단단하게 짓는다.

아차피 이글도 구글 번역기를 돌려서 볼것이고 그러면 이글도 제대로 이해를 못할터 그냥 너 하고 싶은대로 해라, 구린놈이 큰체를 더한다고 남에게 이렇고 저렇고 하지말고 너나 잘해라, 너 보다는 내가 스팀 생태계에 더 이로운 사람이니, 남 걱정 말고 너나 잘하세요, 똑똑한척 해야 너는 내가 보기에는 불쌍하다 못해 측은한 생각이든다. 더이상 너랑 말도 하기 싫으니 네가 하고싶은대로 해라,나도 나 하고싶은대로 할테니...

Sort:  

I haven't downvoted you in the past nor do I usually downvote posts I don't understand. Given your latest downvotes that make 0 sense and only hurt Steem (such as downvoting cross-posts of new authors on Steem) I made a quick decision that this was a garbage post that didn't deserve the rewards.

If you feel you have been unfairly downvoted by curangel which @ocdb follows with it's downvotes then take it up with them. They have open communication and a "decentralized" way to nominate posts for downvotes based on statistics of votes received by the same accounts over and over. While we are against bringing down posts to 0 because the important thing is to encourage genuine curation of other authors instead of self-voting/vote-trading which goes against the EIP, we will adapt and drop the trail if that becomes an issue and is abused. We have mentioned it quite a few times to them that we don't accept posts being brought to 0.

Anyway, I'm a bit tired of attempting to google translate and respond to these with you translating them the same way in mind. It does not make the communication easy but kind of funny at times:

image.png

The way you guys have been openly targetting users in posts, often times innocent authors that have not had anything to do with you such as @taskmaster4450 is absolutely disgusting and hurts the platform a lot. Even the biggest abusers that retaliate when they don't get their way by targeting curation projects and posts they upvote aren't as damaging as putting targets and encouraging your community to downvote them. Especially when minnows who don't even get curated by you for their original content act on it as well because they don't know any better. I hope the time will come when your community realizes what you're doing just for the extra ROI when the majority of other stakeholders are giving the EIP a try and curating or following curation projects with their votes instead of doing everything in their power to just increase their stake by all means.

I'm sure you won't be able to understand what I'm saying through google translate, much like how your analogies are going over my head but there is a reason you were downvoted from this curation project in the first place. It's not because they are "profiting" from it like you guys like to mention in your posts where you try to justify your retaliatory actions. The biggest reason is excessive self-voting or vote-trading, if it wasn't that there would be no reason to downvote you in the first place and being able to point out the self-voting and vote-trading you don't have to be a genius or understand the language, numbers tell it well enough.

너 자신을 알라!

자기 눈에 대들보는 못보고 남의 눈에 티끌은 본다더니
너야말로 바로 그런 사람이구나.

Well, I tried.

https://steemit.com/@swan1/posts

great curation, keep it up!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 60973.26
ETH 2366.47
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.58