RE: LET'S STOP PLAGIARISM CONTEST, 15 Days, Check Day, Rewards 50 Steem
I want to add to your analysis brother @oadissin
From my observation and for @tatjanastan
Please @tatjanastan take note of this irregularities
- 1 @jasonbfaulkner = Disqualified
- 2 @desmoniac = 6 plagiarized post
- 3 @sam-my = 1 plagiarized post
- 4 @victorynuri = 4 plagiarized content
- 5 @suleja = 4 plagiarized content
REASONS AND FACT
@jasonbfaulkner = Disqualified
- Important Note: Unfortunately, we have noticed tendency that users open new accounts, place some plagiarised content in their new blogs on that new account & from their Original account they enter the Contest.
For that reason, if the users declare Plagiarised content from Account opened after today, 3rd May, these profiles WILL BE MUTED.
This user account was created 3 days ago for the sole purpose of this contest.
He has no #intoduceyourself or #achievement1 post for us to know his identity.
Entries can be sent only by new Steemians that has never been rewarded with one of three rewards 1st Place, 2nd Place, 3rd Place Previously
This user must be an old winner who created a new account to win again.
A new member without an introduction post will not know how to truly go about this contest.
If you allow this user @tatjanastan, He will keep creating new accounts every week just to win the contest.And this is not good for #steemit
@desmoniac
Post 1-6= plagiarized content
@sam-my = 1 plagiarized post
- Post 1
The author quoted a Bible verse correctly and you brought the Bible quotation as the plagiarized link. - Post 2
Plagiarized content - Post 3
29 days old content. It does not qualify for this contest which is 15 days old. - post 4
The plagiarism link you submitted was referenced by the author in his post - post 5
23 days old content. It does not qualify for this contest which is 15 days old. - post 6
The plagiarism link you submitted was referenced by the author in his post - post 7
The author quoted a Bible verse correctly and you brought the Bible quotation as the plagiarized link.
@victorynuri
Post 1 - 4 = plagiarized content
@suleja
- post 1
Plagiarized content - post 2
Plagiarized content - post 3
Plagiarized content - post 4
The plagiarized link has the same author as the main post. - post 5
Plagiarized content
Greetings sir...
He didn't cite it nor qoute it with a markdown style
>Before I join this contest I check the previous ones, and I have seen users winning with old post even as old as 2 months and it was counted..
So don't come here and analysis things, I world hard to get this and I deserve the rewards, with my stats I'm the winner with 7 unique Pliagrism contents.
Cc: @tatjanastan
This is where you got it wrong brother.
@tatjanastan have disqualified many in the last contest for your kind of entry.
@ademuji can attest to that. This is a contest about plagiarism and when you apply such tricks to win, then you are a plagiarist as well.
Yes, it is not important how old post is but what worries me is very very poor content of the Entries
You are right, old post shouldn't be counted, so far it isn't up to the 15 days when the contest begins
Thank you bro
Thank you
I understand
Peace Brother,
Thank you for the complementary analysis you shared with us on this round of the contest. I think that you misunderstood this only point:
According to this rule, if USER"A" has its original account and creates USER"B" new account then published inside USER"B" blog post that somehow has been plagiarized. After that he/she enters the contest of @tatjanistan under the account USER"A" the original account where it presents the multiple plagiarized contents discovered in USER"B", which is hardly the case considering the entry of @jasonbfaulkner
I believe it is the way I understood this point but I can be wrong so I invite the public to share their views on this ruleset.
Yes I understand your point brother @oadissin
My major reason for his disqualification is because that account belongs to someone who has won a position in this contest before.