The reason for the confusion is that 99% of the content on Steemit is garbage.
These slags are created by living people. But their intelligence is very low. However, the curators supported this slag and received income. As a result, Steemit's bad standard is built, ignoring the content of the text. In this situation, it will be too late to regret that someone publishes messages through AI.

However, if someone thinks otherwise, then the solution is the opposite. No need to fight AI. It is necessary to improve the procedure for evaluating content by living people. For example, to reward with replicas in dialogues. You can often see that the answer stated in the comet is much more helpful than the question in the post. But the curator rewards the post. And more valuable commentary content will go unrewarded. Lack of motivation for productive communication. At the same time, no matter how bizarre the ChatGPT algorithm is, it is not a problem for a living person to recognize it during a dialogue