You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Questions about AI / Вопросы по AI
with the advent of chatgpt, while there are benefits in some sectors, unfortunately there are also quite a few downsides. At one point there is complete confusion about what is true and what is not.
The reason for the confusion is that 99% of the content on Steemit is garbage.
These slags are created by living people. But their intelligence is very low. However, the curators supported this slag and received income. As a result, Steemit's bad standard is built, ignoring the content of the text. In this situation, it will be too late to regret that someone publishes messages through AI.
However, if someone thinks otherwise, then the solution is the opposite. No need to fight AI. It is necessary to improve the procedure for evaluating content by living people. For example, to reward with replicas in dialogues. You can often see that the answer stated in the comet is much more helpful than the question in the post. But the curator rewards the post. And more valuable commentary content will go unrewarded. Lack of motivation for productive communication. At the same time, no matter how bizarre the ChatGPT algorithm is, it is not a problem for a living person to recognize it during a dialogue
Hopefully times will not come when man will be redundant and robots will take over the world. :)
Many people are redundant now. Laziness, stupidity, parasitism on other people...
But the world will be taken over not by robots, but by barbarians. It always happens that way.
роботам не нужны деньги, роботы в рабстве у тех, кому они нужны.
I agree, the world is changing before our eyes and not always in the desired direction.