It is interesting to see the improvements made to German building law, in particular with the description of the 'Experimental Building' type. Coming from a man who values ​​light and simple regulations, I aspire to simplify and modernize the regulations in the society. But, I disagree with some of your views regarding the possible source of this transfer.

Focusing on 'comfort standards' such as impact sound insulation and reducing room height can reduce costs, but it can also jeopardize quality and safety. The idea of ​​reducing regulations just for the sake of savings must be approached with caution so as not to harm essential standards that protect residents and maintain the integrity of the building.

The example of the master craftsman requiring handrails for stairs and stairs points to a larger issue that is the conflict between regulations and sometimes archaic rules. It is important to improve human-to-human life while also balancing the need for practical, safe, and quality construction standards with cost-saving measures.

I agree with you that less regulations can be beneficial, but it is important that any change in this situation will improve the system and not just make surface level changes. It will be interesting to see how this reform has come about and whether it has achieved its intended purpose without any significant negative consequences.