You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How to Do a Delegation Using steemworld
Thank you for creating this tutorial! Would be great, if you could add the tag #tutorial or #tutorials in your post's settings. I may create a tutorials overview in future and adding a tag would definitely help me to find such posts easier.
Hi.. And Thank you for that amazing tool! It is 'Everything'. I added❤️
Hi @steemchiller.. I am curious about CSI in steemworld. I went through these articles which were written 3 years ago.
I have questions like, does it use the same parameters to indicate CSI? or any new parameters?
Is there any medium that I can contact you privately?
Thank you!
Hi @randulakoralage, basically the calculation of the CSI works still the same. There have been a few small changes regarding the text color (in earlier versions a bad CSI was displayed in red and a good one in green), but this is no longer the case, because I don't want to judge the resulting values.
You can contact me on discord via
steemchiller#7203.@steemchiller,
Did you mean the color or the CSI value? I have some more questions about it. Thank you for the discord id. I just made a request :)
In earlier versions the color represented a good or bad CSI value. The problem with that was, that I needed to define a fixed point from which a 'good' result starts. This fixed point between good and bad can vary based on a user's perspective and many other factors, therefore it's better to let the people judge the CSI value for themselves.
Of course, I always have a minimum CSI value for myself in mind, which is somewhere around
10.0, but I don't want to enforce this number to be used as the one holy edge to good voting behaviour. When I see the CSI drops below10.0for my account, I try to spread my votes among more different authors. So, internally I have a target zone for good and bad voting behaviour in mind (bad is anything below5.0), but I won't make these values public.I hope this makes sense :)
Oh right.. That's the point. Thank you very much for this explanation.