Hello @endingplagiarism, I saw your edit while writing a comment and I was very upset about it. It was a proposal that deserved great support. It is a big loss for the plagiarism-free platform😞 I hope it doesn't stay like this. I still want to add my comment.

I would like to tell you my thoughts as a doctoral student working in academic. Academia is one of the fields most conscious of plagiarism. You have done a very successful job during the process you continued your studies. It is also very sympathetic that you use a humorous and creative style in your comments and posts while fighting against plagiarism.

Teamwork is essential to obtain a plagiarism-free platform. Unfortunately, as you said, there are still leaders who do not understand the seriousness of plagiarism. In this context, I completely agree with your idea of ​​Accreditation. This will be distinctive for real plagiarism fighters and so-called anti-plagiarists.

Plagiarism is unacceptable, especially in the quality content of day of communities that get support booming and steemcurator01 support. Likewise, the posts awarded in contests are also included in this category. Community leaders and moderators should conduct a serious plagiarism scan of the posts they choose for quality or the posts that win in competitions. Because these contents are upvoted directly by booming and steemcurator01, as a result of this, if there is plagiarism, big losses can be experienced.

In this scope, it is necessary to include the steemcurator (03, 06..) accounts that are managed by the countries. At this point, what I would like to say in addition to what you said if any plagiarism is detected in the posts selected as quality posts and awarded in contests, the accreditation of that community should be negatively reflected. Or there may be a scoring system and the score may decrease. Just like the points system on driver's licenses. Since this will be a sanction, the selected content will be reviewed more strictly and seriously.