Remarks:

• Presentation: Your presentation was not good, your cover image although it is relatively original, you did not cover the whole topic of the assignment, only the "Stochastic Oscillator". You did not justify the text of the assignment, you did not use text separators to divide the different sections of the assignment and additionally give your entry a quality format. Finally, some paragraphs are pasted from others which does not look good.

• Spelling and Grammar: You have consecutive spelling and grammatical errors, you should be more careful and improve your writing, since the coherence of the sentences can be affected. Before you publish always proofread the whole text, this way you will minimize the possible errors you may have.

Theory

• Question 1: Your definition of the stochastic oscillator was good, although your concept was constructed piecemeal and not as smoothly.

• Question 2: Your definitions of the lines that make up the stochastic oscillator were fair, as you lacked important details to highlight about them. On the contrary, you were precise when describing the Overbought and Oversold zones, good job on this last one.

• Question 3: The forms you explained were well justified. Good work.

• Question 4: Your definition of PSAR was somewhat incomplete, because you lacked important details to highlight about the indicator.

• Question 5: Your approach to the explanation of this question was fine, however, the only thing you should have explained in this question is that the price must cross the indicator from up to down or vice versa in order for the indicator to change direction.

• Question 6: The forms you explained were good, although you could have gone a little deeper into them.

Practice:

• Question 1: Your explanation in this practice 1 was good, but you did not show me the components of the price chart.

• Question 2: Your explanation in this practice 2 was very good. Good job.

• Question 3: Your explanation in this practice 3, was good, although in the buy signal you pointed out, there was no real confluence between the indicators.