RE: Cryptoacademy | Season 3 week 5| SMA and EMA by @amritraj
Greetings @amritraj. Thank you very much for participating in my class for season 3 (week 5), in the "SteemitCryptoAcademy "
RATING: 6
| Parameters | Rating |
|---|---|
| Presentation Style (Use of Markdown) | 1.5/2 |
| Quality of Content (Mastery of Subject Matter) | 1.5/2 |
| Spelling and Grammar (Writing Fluency) | 1.5/2 |
| Originality | 1/2 |
| Practical Approach | 1/2 |
| Total | 6/10 |
Remarks:
- Presentation: Your presentation was regular, you did not use text separators which would have provided a more quality format to your post.
- Spelling and Grammar: You have spelling and grammatical errors, you should be careful because this can affect the coherence and fluency of your writing.
Theory
Question 1: Your definition of the SMA was fine, the EMA was missing important details.
Question 2: Your explanation of the calculation of the SMA was good, the EMA lacked important details.
Question 3: The forms you detailed in your publication were correct, but it was very brief, you did not detail the use.
Question 4: Your answer on the differences was well justified.
Question 5: Your definition of the setbacks was good although you lacked details to highlight. You did not point out the golden fibonacci zone or levels.
Practice:
Question 1: You passed practice 1.
Question 2: Your bullish fibonacci retracement was poorly plotted.
Ok thank you professor I think I have issue in EMA I will read it again and do better in further tasks