Comment/Recommendation

• Your response offers a wealth of valuable information, highlighting the critical importance of understanding the pulse of the community to anticipate price movements.

However, I also want to address a few critical points regarding the formatting of your answer and not following the questions asked, addressing them one by one:

• Your answer, although rich in content, sometimes suffers from a lack of clear structure. The overall layout and paragraph length make reading less fluid and difficult to follow. A clearer division into distinct sections, corresponding to the questions asked, would certainly have improved the readability of your answer. Additionally, using headings and subheadings would have helped organize your response more coherently.

• Although your answer contains a wealth of valuable information on sentiment analysis in the STEEM market, it sometimes seems to deviate from the original questions. For example, some parts of your answer focus more on technical aspects or general information about the STEEM market, rather than direct answers to the questions asked. A better match between the content of your answer and the specific questions would have strengthened its relevance and precision.

Despite these criticisms, I would like to emphasize the enormous value of your contribution and the depth of your analysis. Your ability to unpack the intricacies of sentiment analysis in the STEEM market is undeniable, and I encourage you to continue your excellent work while taking these points into account to further enrich your future contributions.

Total| 7/10