AI can actually be used positively as a reference for writers to develop their ideas in writing, but using it brutally actually endangers the continuity of their creativity in writing.

As an active user, since the beginning I have actively tested various types of AI detectors, but this cannot always be used as a final reference, even in personal experience I have experienced surprises when using English grammar repair services, the results of the 6 detectors I tested show that 99% of the writing is a product of AI.

I was surprised and had discussions with many platform users, both in Indonesia and even other users who understand English grammar well. It can be concluded that the detector will detect text generated by AI if the grammar writing for each sentence is very good, based on our discussion, it would be better for the writers of this platform to use their own language, without using a translator tool or Grammarly service so that unwanted things can be avoided.

As a verifier in the community, I continue to build interaction and polls regarding this in groups and individual discord. It is not easy to convict that an article detected by AI is an AI product. I did the steps that took a lot of time and effort by:

1. Repeatedly reading the verified text carefully
2. Look at the background of the previous writing and compare the style of language.
3. Translate into different languages ​​to recognize it, because some users use their country language, then translate. I've even found writing that was recycled using the re-writer tool.
4. Quoting the important points written, then copying and pasting them in the GPT chat. As a result I found that they use GPT chat. An original author would not emulate every key point written by an AI product.

Engagement Challenges are also prone to be found by AI Products, but the percentage is very small but it takes the admin and moderator's hard work as verifiers to be more thorough in checking each article to be verified.

In certain cases, diary games can also be written using AI, the author outsmarts this by setting points of activity from morning to evening. This is a very difficult job to do, because it involves the user's daily activities, but back to my previous discussion that background and his writing style is an important indicator to suspect him and focus on searching and proving.

Weaknesses for the global community when they do not represent moderator representatives who master a particular language, of course it will take quite a lot of time for just 1 post. Should the representation of a moderator who understands a variety of languages ​​be considered in combating this problem.

I will add other special problems that are crucial, for example in writing a game diary. The game diary is principally a diary for the writer within 1 day, meaning that in addition to the activities, the author also includes photos of the activities as a complement to the story. In fact, not all diaries use pictures on the same day, even pictures on several days are made into 1 diary.

In my opinion, this is ethical, and everyone should pay attention.