You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: [PROXY] @proxy.token disagrees with 0.22.2 soft fork and revoked voting to witnesses who agreed with that.
I definitely understand why you feel this way about the Softfork... (justin rightfully made a purchase and just wanted to be able to use what he bought... the underlying problem remains that the sale never shouldve happened as it wasn’t Neds personal cash) but I can’t seem to understand why you would support the Tron takeover of STEEM and vote these new sock-puppet witnesses... your last paragraph says you will continue to support and develop the steem community... why now are you choosing to help destroy the community?
True. It's one thing to dislike the witnesses move but that doesn't mean one has to support the retaliation that is even worse. Voting for the fake witnesses doesn't reflect: "I disagree with the softfork."
It actually means: "I appreciate the centralization and support this kind of governance."
Hello @rosepac,
I guess I share many of your thoughts about how steemit is and how much better it could be. I don't agree with everything around here and I think the governance method is far from perfect.
I just think a "network of 1" is more centralized than a network of 20. I respect your opinion, though. And obviously I also expect this mess comes to an end quickly.
Hello @rosepac,
I guess I share many of your thoughts about how steemit is and how much better it could be. I don't agree with everything around here and I think the governance method is far from perfect.
I just think a "network of 1" is more centralized than a network of 20. I respect your opinion, though. And obviously I also expect this mess comes to an end quickly.