The danger of the diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Scientific study)
I published yesterday a post titled "Why I'm very happy to not have Vaxxed my baby girl with the Hepatitis B vaccine" that if you want to read and upvote it you can find here: https://steemit.com/vaccines/@freedomvigilante/why-i-m-very-happy-to-not-have-vaxxed-my-baby-girl-with-the-hepatitis-b-vaccine
On the comments of that post a Doctor from India I believe (by the content of his SteemIt) is defending vaccines. Initially he was defending them just with the typical false rhetoric fabricated by the pharmaceutical industry so I requested that he backed all his statements with scientific papers as I had done on my post. On a subsequent reply he sends me this study "A population-based, postlicensure evaluation of the safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine in a large managed care organization.":
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19047220
I'm open minded and I enjoy reading scientific papers, so let's see how the study was performed and to what conclusion it arrives.
They had two groups:
Group 1: The control group that were infants vaccinated with "diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine and separate doses of hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines"
Group 2: The test group, infants vaccinated with a single shot of "diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus vaccine"
What they found is that both groups had the same level of "safety events" which is a nice way of saying strong reactions to the vaccine which is not very surprising as both groups got a huge amount of vaccines! In control group 15 infants had seizures and in the test group 16 had seizures. So their conclusion, that I don't agree with and I'll explain why later, is that it is as bad injecting all the vaccines at the same time (5 vaccines) than injecting them in three shots (3+1+1).
And those are only the ones that had a really strong reaction because no study was done about the neurological damage made to the ones that didn't get the seizure.
Why are they getting seizures? because the vaccine is damaging the central nervous system, all the infants suffer the damage but manage not to get a seizure when some of them get the seizure. But the important point is not if there is a seizure or not, the important point is that the vaccine is damaging so much the brain of all the infants that some even get seizures!
This is another scientific study that proves that vaccines is poisoning our children!
If it was not poisoning then seizures would not happen an if there are seizures is because the nervous system is attacked in all infants, not only on the ones that had seizures.
And the study failed to report on all the other short, medium and long term side effects of the vaccine. Also, at least in the abstract, the study does not indicate what was the time span between getting shot 1, shot 2 and shot 3 in the control group and this makes a huge difference. Was the control group given the different shots on the same day, the same week, a month later, a year later? That information is crucial as well as measuring the levels of mercury, thimerosal, aluminium and whatever other poisons the vaccines had on them. Without all that information the study is practically useless and only serves the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, which most probably financed the study. I know how it works, I have insider knowledge about the clinical trials and the pharmaceutical industry.
Vaccines are not safe, vaccines are poisoning and killing people! The remedy is worst than the problem.
http://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/the-dangers-of-whooping-cough-vaccination-prof-gordon-stewart/
If you found this post valuable, then please kindly resteem it, so that others can as well benefit.
NOTES :
You can support my work by upvoting and following me if you are interested on the themes I write about. I post about health, cryptocurrencies and some times politics, but not much ;)
If you don't agree with my ideas please comment it and we can talk, please don't downvote me because I have different ideas than you, that is censoring. Down voting is for when you think that the article does not have quality (I hope it does have even if you do not agree with it)
i love it thank you
Wow...very interessting. Everyone should read this.
Followed and upvoted you. now its your turn :-)
So one in roughly 4000 children got an allergic reaction, while the vaccines saved the live (depending on the other conditions) of up to 500 children in those 4000.
I think the vaccines win.
Allergic reactions are not brain damage. You can die from a allergic reaction when you go to the dentist, and that surely has nothing to do with brain damage.
When answering, please back up your statements with scientific papers.
First, who told you that up to 500 children lives were saved? There is no scientific proof of that statement. Neither you nor me have any way of knowing if 500 lives were saved, or 4000, or 0, or even if 500 lives were lost because of the vaccine, that would not have been lost if they had never been vaccinated. There is no scientific study that could prove any of the statements above so anything said in that sense is all speculation and faithful believe, not science.
Second, on the following paper they challenge that seizures provokes brain damage but instead the seizure is result of a brain damage due to another factor: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14684233
So if it is the brain damage that causes the seizure, it is the vaccine provoking the brain damage in the first place.
Also in this paper you can find out how seizures cause severe cognitive decline: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1783429/
Finally, if you are still not convinced, here is another scientific paper "Abnormal Brain Connectivity Spectrum Disorders Following Thimerosal Administration"
This paper proves that vaccines provoke Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), tic disorder (TD), and hyperkinetic syndrome of childhood (also known as attention deficit disorder [ADD]/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD])
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433557/
So I insist, vaccines provoked brain damage in all the vaccinated infants and a few of them got seizures. Furthermore we don't know if any life at all was saved afterwards because of the vaccination but we do know that the vaccines created Austim, tic disorder, hyperkinetic syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
These are FACTS from scientific papers, and not the "marketing material" from the pharmaceutical industry that is taught in medical school and that doctors get.
I don't need that. I thought it was clear it was just a rule of thumb estimated based on rates before widespread vaccination.
And even if I missed by a whole magnitude that is still 50 saved compared to 15 with allergic reactions - which is not necessarily death or permament damage.
No paper proves, even if done 100% correctly. Just saying generally.
Vacination is recommended but health workers make sure its not put life in danger.