You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Deep curation...we need super curators and they need power
There sure is, its the 'steemit' account. They could also amalgamate the scattered dormant accounts into the steemit account to boost it's power but I doubt that would be necessary. I think a valid approach to the dormant accounts would be to burn them all.
Burn them all😮?....you know some people runs like 3 to 5 accounts you know?
Only the ones controlled by Steemit :)
Speaking of dormant accounts.....if one may add a personal note to the dialogue....there is an account named @bluejay.....that is dormant which is the recipient of money transfers from time to time that were meant for @bleujay. Do you know how one is to go about obtaining the funds or a better solution the account itself.
Additional note......The @bluejay account has never been used.
Thank you for your time. Regards, @bleujay.
I don't think there's anything wrong with having multiple accounts...my apologies for the mixup, I should have been clearer. I'm referring only to those dormant accounts controlled by Steemit.
Thank you for your reply.
I see......no this is not a multiple account topic....this is an account that is dormant.....not mine....but receives funds accidentally/by mistake that are meant for me as the name is similar.
Do you have any thoughts about how one can go about resolving thsi problem.
Of course I see what you mean now. The only thing I can think of would be for Steemit.inc to deploy an additional unique identifier, one set by the user (you) like a nickname so that anyone transferring to you had another fast visual way to make sure they had the right account. Or perhaps a system identifier like bitshares had....a unique robot image!
Thank you for your reply @benjojo.
Yes.....that is a lovely idea. Appreciate your thoughts.