the obvious ways to do this are :

• well upvote ofcourse or you get nothing
• re-steem for bigger exposure, the more votes the more to divide, re-steeming doesnt even cost a thing
• follow because i'm not sure what to do with my 10% pledge on this one, is it participants only or random follower, i havent even found someone to tell me what the method call is using curl so i got time to think but
• dont worry , everything will be done strict yet manually until then, no vote wasted

SO ... atm i'm wobbling between push to the next distribution or leave out either the lowest or the highest ... nothing is set in stone , the only thing here i want is fair (and to advance myself ofcourse, that goes without saying)
so if there's not enough to give even the minimum 0.001 to every participant the idea is not to pull it out of my pockets because those are empty enough as is, it will either go to the next post on distribution OR some people will have be left out, either the one that needs it the least ... OR the 100 bots who voted 1% at zero weight, needless to say accounts with names like iamnotabot000 to iamnotabot999 will get at best one share, i think thats fair enough, i'm trying to get to a ruleset that works as i do this, planning ? i dont believe in planning due to entropy being the core of existence and neither did sun tzu, the best plan is no plan, improvisation but i agree there has to be a framework and basic set so anyone who "wastes" (lol) a vote knows what they're getting into

The payout for : https://steemit.com/giveaway/@ubasti/sbd-distrobot-upvote-for-equal-share-deadline-at

0.818SBD plus 0.000SBD remainder of last payout , divided by 9 eligible equals 0.09 each

payments declined by @rudyardcatling , @sakhmet , @steemitboard(well , i assume since they dont follow anything, if they want their share i'll be happy to provide it)

recipients :

@darsico , @hr1 , @mikebluehair42 , @armadilloman , @mitchconnor , @aiyumi , @aniketmore1925 , @ubg

and ofourse

@ubasti who is trying hard to make this work for everyone

100% upvotes : @mikebluehair42 , @aiyumi , @aniketmore1925
(decided by "google: random number", holding my hand before my eyes and clicking a few times so if you can hack that you get more chance at ONE VOTE WOOO-WEE!)
theres plenty of accounts there that are stale but if they don't decline payment i have to stick to certain standards since they voted (dropping stale accounts from a non-payable post is also an option but so far i dont see posts that are in danger of being undividable)

payouts have been made, votes will be cast when available, a vote from you is more for you :)

the remainder will be carried over to the next payout

as the minimum one can send is 0.001SBD that means ... what does that mean ? if 500 votes reach only 0.5 then everyone can still get 0.001 ? is that what it means ? so in that case if there's a payout there 'shouldnt' be a problem, barring exceptions

there will be no upvotes since that was not an SBD-distro post but simply an introduction, upvotes will only be raffled on three contestants of actual SBD-distro posts (needless to say upvotes will not be given to 'stale' accounts with the most recent post older than six days) its gonna be a bot after all, i will need SOME kind of algorithm heh

i think that's all ... for now, happy voting, lets not get poorer together

long version --->

i'mm gonna put this in -signature post- https://steemit.com/ubasti/@ubasti/ubasti-signature-post-20180501

mmh, if i understood correctly , the number of shares in @steembasicincome should now guarantee payout on every post here, minimal but still .. so void votes can be paid to a certain extent although in most cases leeches arent very much preferred, if you vote, it would be very nice if it has at least a little weight ... thats how this works or it doesnt, unless i'm whale sized

which i wont be if everyone casts zero percent votes but

so far so good :)

expect the worst

hope for nothing

NEVER be disappointed