SBD distrobot - upvote for equal share - deadline at cashout_time "2018-05-19T11:46:54"

ubasti (55)in #giveaway • 6 years ago (edited)

please note : if you're feeling generous and want to decline payment for the current post you voted on, the remainder WILL be distributed among those who don't, if YOU do , then please leave it in comment, thanks, otherwise it will pay out even to stale accounts, which is a bit of a shame imo

_{@ubasti is 15 days old and has distributed 2.240BD to participants}

also : re-steems here are accidents alas since im total chaos and go from multiple browsers it happened a few times, no harm done but its a bit messy and sbd will be distributed for all non-resteem posts that pay out at cashout_time but upvotes will only be raffled on the actual SBD distrobot posts (like this), it's work in progress but paying out is kinda fun, even if its only at sardine-level

_{the deadline is ... (12 hours before) "2018-05-19T11:46:54"

_{deadline can shift if post is edited afterwards but voting shouldnt be possible from 12 hours before actual deadline at the time of posting}}

_{the total SP of @ubasti : 15.741 SP (no delegation)
100 % vote is worth: .00346143569276968314(subject to market fluctuation this is the value of shares in SBD)

015
hm, could use a bit more shiney banner i suppose
short version :
upvote to get equal share on payout day - three 100% votes will be given randomly to three different people who voted on this post (on payout day ofcourse) and for every 10sp @ubasti gets i will enroll someone at random into @steembasicincome chosen from people who have participated (with the next 1sp that is, so the 1% after every 10%)
the obvious ways to do this are :

well upvote ofcourse or you get nothing
re-steem for bigger exposure, the more votes the more to divide, re-steeming doesnt even cost a thing
follow because i'm not sure what to do with my 10% pledge on this one, is it participants only or random follower, i havent even found someone to tell me what the method call is using curl so i got time to think but
dont worry , everything will be done strict yet manually until then, no vote wasted

The payout for : https://steemit.com/giveaway/@ubasti/sbd-distrobot-upvote-for-equal-share-deadline-at-cashouttime-sat-may-5-11-57-49-cest-2018
0.016SBD plus 0.003SBD remainder of last payout , divided by 5 eligible equals 0.003SBD each
payments declined by @rudyardcatling , @sakhmet , @sbi5
recipients : @kiobot , @mitchconnor , @unicron , @tuukka69
and ofourse
@ubasti who is trying hard to make this work for everyone
100% upvotes : @mitchconnor(c) , @unicron(2) (<-stale accounts and accounts with only comments that arents stale, minimal number of votes, i dont think i need to validate my fairness but feel free to challenge it)

(decided by "google: random number", holding my hand before my eyes and clicking a few times so if you can hack that you get more chance at ONE VOTE WOOO-WEE!)

theres plenty of accounts there that are stale but if they don't decline payment i have to stick to certain standards since they voted (dropping stale accounts from a non-payable post is also an option but so far i dont see posts that are in danger of being undividable)
payouts have been made, votes will be cast when available, a vote from you is more for you :)
the remainder of 0.004SBD will be carried over to the next payout
upvotes will only be raffled on three contestants of actual SBD-distro posts (needless to say upvotes will not be given to 'stale' accounts with the most recent post older than six days) its gonna be a bot after all, i will need SOME kind of algorithm heh
and ... a pool of no more than 0.500SBD will be kept ("no more than") at all times to provide a minimum payout of 0.001SBD in case the divide is below that, to all participants, for as long as the pool lasts, anything above that ever will be converted to sp right away, after all, over time, assuming participants will run in the dozens and mostly cast low votes and not decline, the raffled uptvotes will be worth a lot more, but there's alway a minimum for playing in that case (well... always, i havent worked this out to the last digit over a span of ten years lol, the main goal is "fair" division, not clinical semantic legalism)
i think that's all ... for now, happy voting, lets not get poorer together
long version --->}

i'm not sure the long version is needed anymore ... one own post and one re-steem from @sakhmet, @sakhmet re-steem all 100% votes from @ubasti (among others) and don't tell me 'this' is cheating