RE: Chemtrails: The Truth And The Conspiracy Theory
i try not to speculate too much about things i cannot prove. i KNOW there is aluminum and barium in the sky, because i, personally, have done my own tests. i have no need to pollute the data i collect with assumptions about whether something is nefarious or not. the data speaks for itself. i have no need to try to discredit real data, by calling it dumb, stupid, or trying to make it look ridiculous by saying words such as nefarious, hidden, or fearful. usually, i find that the fearful are the ones who would reject the idea of gathering the data themselves, rather than simply believing what they are told.
i don't bitch about fluoride. i only take measures to protect myself. i don't much care to try to convince people who think that all is fluffy rainbows and yummy lollipops, everything is right with the world, and there are no bad people.
i have read about many experiments from the 50's, 60's, into vietnam, and all the way to today. NASA has even done a few, publicly.
listing experiments from 60 years ago does nothing to explain the data that can be readily collected today, by anyone with an extra $20, an amazon account, and the knowledge to understand what they are doing.
if you believe that nothing is going on today, and the last experiments were in the 60's, you're welcome to. be my guest. i, though, know what i can measure, and am not in denial of the evidence of my senses, or the measurements made by my equipment.
you may benefit by educating yourself about the concept of the strawman, and the ad hominem. these are what are called logical fallacies. there are many more. there is even a list on wikipedia. understanding these are very useful in knowing when you are making an argument that is baseless or founded in demonstrable fact.